<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://drillordrop.com/2026/09/16/errors-uncertainty-and-missing-information-burniston-draft-permit-decision/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>DRILL OR DROP?</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-09-16T07:53:30+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>“Errors, uncertainty and missing information” &#8211; Burniston draft permit decision</news:title><news:keywords>Fracking, conditions, drilling, gas, permit, survey, Environment Agency, assessment, evidence, pollution, decision, information, planning permission, risk, consultation, groundwater, seismic, inconsistent, monitoring, data, transparency, environmental, flaring, methane emissions, questions, baseline data, approval, public meeting, public consultation, specific, refuse, concerns, fracture, draft, North York Moors National Park, Europa Oil &amp; Gas, official, withdraw, Scarborough, 3D, proppant squeeze, final, grant, proposed, rocks, minded, errors, inconsistency, uncertainty, hydraulic fracture plan, robust, error, HFP, waste gas, missing, flaws, predicted, criticised, certainty, incorrect, lack, Burniston, reservoir stimulation, Frack Free Coastal Communities, unclear, lower-volume, defer, Burniston Parish Council, pressures, incomplete, fully addressed, site-specific, independently verified, relies, unanswered, oil-based fluid, small volume, corrected, waste management</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://drillordrop.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/260424-burniston-8-1.jpg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://drillordrop.com/2026/09/15/government-refuses-to-block-lower-volume-fracking/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>DRILL OR DROP?</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-09-15T22:03:01+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Government refuses to block lower-volume fracking</news:title><news:keywords>Fracking, oil, gas, frack, government, legal, public, debate, Energy Minister, shale gas, hydraulic fracturing, safety, ban, communities, benefits, new, onshore, statements, conventional, legislation, moratorium, target, seismicity, licences, offshore, fluid, block, Wressle, loophole, volume, low, proppant squeeze, issues, continuous, issue, operators, West Newton-A, threshold, safeguard, natural environment, administration, climate leadership, Burniston, Alison Hume, confirmed, lower-volume, exploited, Energy Independence Bill, Burnham, refuses, Martin McCluskey, total ban, induces, single-stage, hidden route, reassurance, Claire Young, watertight</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://drillordrop.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/260915-martin-mccluskey-parliament-tv.jpg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>