Is INEOS planning to drill for shale gas in Sherwood Forest?


Sherwood Forest. Photo: Nilfanion (Wikimedia UK) [CC BY-SA 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)%5D, via Wikimedia Commons]

Friends of the Earth released a document today which it says contains evidence that the chemical company, INEOS, is planning to drill for shale gas in Sherwood Forest, in Nottinghamshire.

INEOS, which has previously said it has no intention of shale gas exploration in the forest, described Friends of the Earth’s claim as “entirely false”. It accused the organisation of “increasingly erratic pronouncements” and “an attempt to create fake news”. Friends of the Earth said it had thoroughly investigated the facts.

So who is right? The answer seems to lie in your definition of Sherwood Forest – and Friends of the Earth and INEOS have different definitions.

Here’s what is undisputed:

  • INEOS Shale holds the exploration licence PEDL307
  • PEDL307 includes parts of the Sherwood Forest National Nature Reserve and Sherwood Forest Country Park.
  • In an email from 22 November 2017, INEOS’s land agent referred to a site at The Lings for a potential shale gas well in PEDL307

PEDL307 (marked in yellow). Map: UK Onshore Geophysical Library

“No fracking in the forest”

In January 2017, INEOS Shale told the energy news website Rigzone:

“INEOS Shale is not fracking in Sherwood Forest.”

In a recent two-page advert in local papers, the company said:

“Despite what people may have read or heard, we have no intention of placing drilling rigs for shale wells inside the forest now or in the future”.

But Friends of the Earth said email correspondence between the land agent, FGP, and the Forestry Commission confirmed that INEOS was considering land on the western edge of Sherwood Forest.


Two potential INEOS well sites, marked by red blocks. Source: INEOS Shale


The email, released in response to a Freedom of Information request, included the map above marking two rectangular sites at The Lings, near Clipstone, between Edwinstowe and Market Warsop. Link to email


The email says:

“If you have time, please have a look at the attached before tomorrow.

“I could not email this to you before now as I needed to meet with [REDACTED] and his agent first for them to approve sending this to you”.


“The world’s most famous forest”

Friends of the Earth campaigner, Guy Shrubsole, said:

“We already knew INEOS wanted to explore for shale gas in Sherwood Forest by carrying out seismic surveys – now, despite their assurances, we see they want to drill there, too.

“INEOS appear to have no qualms about drilling in what they call ‘arguably the most famous forest in the world’, and they are prepared to mislead communities about their intentions to get what they want.”

Local resident and a member of Frack Free Sherwood, Deb Hodson, said:

“Our concerns around fracking in this area have been confirmed by INEOS themselves.

“My hope is that now the general public can see the constant discrepancies that are being put forward by INEOS, they will research for themselves how this will affect our community.”

“Misrepresented location”

INEOS told DrillOrDrop that Friends of the Earth had “completely misrepresented the location of two potential well sites”.

A spokesperson said:

“As INEOS has previously made clear, there are no plans to drill in Sherwood Forest and nothing in the documents released today contradicts that.”

“Today’s contributions from FOE can only be described as an attempt to create fake news.”

Is The Lings in Sherwood Forest?

INEOS is correct to say that the potential sites at the Lings are not in the Sherwood Forest National Nature Reserve nor Sherwood Forest Country Park.


Source: Google Maps


But the sites are, as Friends of the Earth says, within the boundary of the proposed Sherwood Forest Regional Park and an area identified as “The Heart of the Forest” or “Heart of Sherwood”.


Map: Nottinghamshire County Council


Map: Sherwood Forest Visitor

Friends of the Earth is also correct to say that the sites are within the historic extent of Sherwood Forest. 800 years ago, according to the Sherwood Forest Trust, the woods and heathlands covered 46,900 hectares, stretching from Worksop to the city of Nottingham.


Map: Sherwood Forest Trust

The organisation said current OS maps indicate that The Lings is in an area named as Sherwood Forest.

But INEOS rejected Friends of the Earth’s argument. In response to a question from DrillOrDrop, the company said:

“The proposed Sherwood Forest Regional Park has a very broad catchment area including agricultural and industrial areas and even cities. The “Heart of the Forest” also appears to be a wide circle drawn around a mixed landscape area both within and outside the confines of Sherwood Forest.

“Although the potential well site you asked about does sit within those two named areas I don’t believe Friends of the Earth are making a relevant or credible point by referencing them. Areas with environmental designations are identified and excluded as part of our site screening process.”

Guy Shrubsole, of Friends of the Earth, responded:

“Damned by their own documents, INEOS have resorted to alleging ‘fake news’. What we’ve uncovered is the very opposite: the result of thoroughly investigating the facts. It is actually just called news, however unwelcome for INEOS.

“Their response does however confirm their ongoing intention to drill for shale gas at The Lings – an area that a council-commissioned report states lies within ‘the Heart of Sherwood Forest’.”

INEOS would not comment on the status of the discussions about the potential sites “for reasons of commercial confidentiality”.

But a spokesperson said:

“INEOS Shale is currently at the beginning of the process of consulting with local people on drilling locations in England. This involves hearing a multitude of different viewpoints from all sections of society including FOE. As part of this we have offered to meet with Friends of the Earth on numerous occasions to discuss the facts around our operations. This would also give us the opportunity to ask them the question, since they have endorsed the use of natural gas as a bridging fuel towards a renewable energy future, where this gas will come from?”

DrillOrDrop asked Friends of the Earth if it had been invited to a meeting with INEOS. A spokesperson said some of its individual campaigners had been tweeted by INEOS staff but there had been no formal invitation from the company. Friends of the Earth was hoping to meet INEOS and was looking for a date, the spokesperson added. INEOS later got in touch to say that it had received no convenient dates from Friends of the Earth.

Updated 17/2/2017 to include INEOS reaction on meeting dates (see final paragraph above)

21 replies »

  1. “One of the easiest and cheapest ways to reduce fuel poverty would be a massive insulation programme and proper intervention in the housing market to make sure all new homes are maximum energy efficient”.

    So, that has not been done already???How many more times do you think the public TAX PAYER will be fooled by such nonsense??

    This is absolute fiction. Billions of Pounds have been spent on such actions in the last few years and you reach an end point, until you decide to flatten all of the housing stock and start again. It is the argument used continuously, but we all find that there is a practical end point. Massive loft insulation, in wall insulation, double glazing and air or earth sourced heat pumps. BUT-add one 90+ year relative into the house and look at your energy bills over a winter! It’s called “care in the community”, heating on 24/7 over the winter with the thermostat at 22C plus.

    I quite agree to alternative energy sources WHEN they have been properly assessed and value for money determined.

    I do not want solar panels made in China using huge amounts of thermal coal energy to manufacture, that are shipped to the UK and then 13 put on a roof produce 33p of energy on a sunny winters day.

    I do not want land based wind turbines that land owners love because the subsidy from tax payers meant they could net £150k each/year, even when not in use.

    I like the idea of lagoon power generation, but at £1 billion for a test facility which “might” work, and which will destroy much of the Lizard to construct, I need more convincing. Or you put a small one on the end of your house, and have to rebuild following vibration damage.

    I do not like the idea of 3 million tonnes of our cereals being processed to produce “green” fuel, when EVEN IN A BUMPER HARVEST that is ALL of the UK surplus cereal production. So, we will not have bread, but are happy with “green” fuel?

    I do not like the idea of energy “schemes” burning wood pellets which means deforesting certain parts of the globe to satisfy our “greenness.” Especially when those green schemes are not controlled and hundreds of millions of £ are wasted.

    If we are going to pay huge prices for NEW nuclear energy (yes, we will) that allows alternative energy to work, I want this discounted by other sources to prevent fuel poverty.

    I do not want to rely on other sources of gas. The Norwegians are lovely people, but will sell to the highest bidder. If Vlad. turns off the taps, that will be a problem. Speak with any Norwegian who has done National Service along their northern border, and what they have been told, and then think security.

    If you want your gas coming around Yemen, good luck!

    When alternative energy no longer means an alternative to sound costings and common sense, then I will say we can not bother with fracking tests. All experience to date shows we are NO way near that. Money has been poured away over the last few years trying to prove the opposite, but almost every time it shows that decisions have been based on false assumptions, and huge amounts of money have been wasted to placate those who propose an alternative which is not practical or available as yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s