Drilling Diary

Diary of meetings, conferences, speeches, debates, rallies and demonstrations about fracking, shale and onshore oil and gas. The current month’s diary is updated as new events are planned. It also includes dates later in the year. Please let us know about events you think should be included

manchester_civil_justice_centreMarch 2017

 

 

 

februaryFebruary 2017

 

 

 

1701January 2017

 

 

 

1612bDecember 2016

 

 

 

1611November 2016

 

 

 

october-2016October 2016

 

 

 

September 2016September 2016

 

 

 

August   August 2016

Older diaries

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

2015

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

2 replies »

  1. Hopefully some links to experiences might come in useful to visitors interest:

    http://conservationco.org/admin/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Final-Rebuttal-Exhibits.pdf-Adobe-Acrobat-Pro.pdf
    UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
    COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
    MINORITY STAFF
    APRIL 2011

    CHEMICALS USED IN HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

    Concludes:
    it appears that the companies are injecting fluids containing unknown
    chemicals about which they may have limited understanding of the potential risks posed to
    human health and the environment.
    VI. CONCLUSION
    Hydraulic fracturing has opened access to vast domestic reserves of natural gas that could
    provide an important stepping stone to a clean energy future. Yet questions about the safety of
    hydraulic fracturing persist, which are compounded by the secrecy surrounding the chemicals
    used in hydraulic fracturing fluids. This analysis is the most comprehensive national assessment
    to date of the types and volumes of chemical used in the hydraulic fracturing process. It shows
    that between 2005 and 2009, the 14 leading hydraulic fracturing companies in the United States
    used over 2,500 hydraulic fracturing products containing 750 compounds. More than 650 of
    these products contained chemicals that are known or possible human carcinogens, regulated
    under the Safe Drinking Water Act, or listed as hazardous air pollutants.

    http://earthjustice.org/features/campaigns/pennsylvania-and-fracking logs fraccidents in Pennsylvania
    In Pennsylvania, where the pace of drilling has tripled oil and gas companies are contaminating water faster than the state’s treatment plants can handle it. In some cases, people’s wells have even exploded, residents can light the water from their faucet on fire, and pets have gotten sick from drinking tap water. The Monongahela River, a drinking water source for 350,000 people, was poisoned. Pristine state forest is being handed over to oil and gas companies

    Gas proponents might continue to insist that gas drilling has never damaged a single water supply, yet we now know there are plenty of instances where it has. As it turns out, PA DEP knows this, too, though they had to be sued to produce the evidence. They claimed, unsuccessfully, that the public records requested by The Times-Trbune were “too burdensome” to find. In The Times-Tribune’s Sunday Times Review of DEP Drilling Records Reveals Water Damage, Murky Testing Methods, Legere reviews the pages eventually furnished by the civil servants of this hyper-reluctant state agency:
    “State environmental regulators determined that oil and gas development damaged the water supplies for at least 161 Pennsylvania homes, farms, churches and businesses between 2008 and the fall of 2012, according to a cache of nearly 1,000 letters and enforcement orders written by Department of Environmental Protection officials and obtained by The Sunday Times.”

    http://www.frackingcanada.ca/alberta-the-campbells/
    lab test revealed methane, ethane, propane, butane and isobutane. The contents alone tells you that it is not naturally occuring or biogenic (from bacteria) because bacteria cannot produce propane, butane and higher order hydrocarbons.
    The ERCB hired a company to take soil samples in our area after we pointed out an area of dying trees close water well. In 2012, three horizontal wells were drilled near us. One less than a quarter mile away has had a constant flare burning since. In 2012, three horizontal wells were drilled near us. One less than a quarter mile away has had a constant flare burning since.
    Their sampling results indicate the sour gas is coming from the aquifer, not our wellbore………………We’ve learned that some of the side effects of sour gas exposure are impaired eyesight, loss of smell and loss of brain cells

    Sadly it would seem many of pro fracking politicians in this country have been exposed to the latter!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s