Industry

Third Energy releases equipment from fracking site because of “delays over final consent”

km8Empty1

Crane arrives at KM8 to start loading equipment. Photo: Steven Spy

Third Energy confirmed tonight it was releasing some equipment from its fracking site at Kirby Misperton in North Yorkshire after the government required a review of the company’s finances.

The company said the review process could take “some time” and it expected “a further period” before final consent from the Government. Equipment was being redeployed to other projects, it said.

Anti-fracking campaigners photographed large vehicles transporting equipment off the site today.

km8Leave7

Convoy on the approach to Kirby Misperton village Photo: Steven Spy

The Business Secretary, Greg Clark, announced last month that before making a decision on fracking consent at the KM8 well, he had instructed the Oil and Gas Authority to review Third Energy’s financial resilience. This would include the eventual decommissioning of the site.

In a statement this evening, the company said there would be:

“a further period before we can expect final consent from the Government to proceed with our operations.”

Third Energy media update Feb 2018 (pdf)

km8Leave8

Drilling site equipment on the road to Kirby Misperton Photo: Steven Spy

The statement continued:

“As this process may take some time we have agreed with the relevant contractors to release some of their equipment from site; namely the coil tubing unit, the well control unit and the workover rig.

“This will allow our contractors to deploy their equipment to other projects during the financial review.

“We will maintain the majority of the operational equipment onsite and continue all of the monitoring requirements set by the regulators.

“We have informed North Yorkshire County Council and the Police about the planned movements and will be working with them to ensure they are undertaken safely and without disruption to residents.”

km8leave10

Convoy enters Kirby Misperton village. Photo: Steven Spy

Third Energy had told residents in November it was ready to begin fracking. In the statement it said:

“We appreciate that this situation creates further uncertainty for residents and we thank them for their patience.

“Given that there will be no hydraulic fracturing operations at the site until final consent is received, we hope that the protestors will also give residents a break from their campaign of disruption and this will enable everyone to resume their normal daily lives and also reduce pressure on North Yorkshire Police.”

Third Energy repeated its previous statement that it was pleased that it had satisfied 13 technical conditions required under the Infrastructure Act before fracking could go ahead at the KM8 well.

The company also said it was continuing to invest and develop its existing conventional fields.

“We are pleased to report that initial tests from our project to enhance gas flows are showing encouraging results.”

Third Energy also said it had begun the process of extending a range of permissions at well sites in the Vale of Pickering and at the Knapton Generating Station.

Today’s lorries came out of the site in a single convoy and opponents of the fracking operation carried out a “slow walking” protest.

km8Leave6

Convoy is slow-walked from KM8 site. Photo: Steven Spy

 

Reactions

Alan Linn, Third Energy’s chief operating officer

“We would like this time to ensure that everything is done, dusted, signed, sealed, delivered, then we bring the equipment back and we run it efficiently. And that’s good for us in terms of managing our project. It’s also good for the community in terms of minimising the amount of time and disruption the work that we’re undertaking could lead to.

“If we take it offsite now and we rest it for a while, whilst it goes and does other work, and we make sure we’ve done a thorough process with the government, then we can plan it all coming back on. Because we’ll have all of our permissions in place and we’re ready to go, when it comes back on we can get straight on to the project, we can complete it quickly and we can get everything off.”
Source: interview with BBC News 7/1/2018

Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

“There is no change from our perspective.”
Source: statement 

Karen Garrett, vice chair of Great and Little Barugh Parish Council and a member of the community liaison committee

“Once again, Third Energy are being reactive rather than proactive as questions had been raised over what was happening with equipment. A statement prior to this might have been more appropriate to inform local residents and allay speculation. Some monitoring equipment had already been removed from the surrounding area leading to concerns from residents. With the ongoing sensitivities they need to have higher regard for the communities.

The investigation into Third Energy’s financial affairs is welcomed as it has been a key area of concern for a very long time.
Source: statement

Kirby Misperton Protection Camp

“Campaigners have vowed to peacefully protest at KM8 until Third Energy go bust, and this announcement suggests we haven’t got too long to wait. The fact that contractors are recalling their equipment while the government investigates Third Energy’s finances doesn’t bode well for the health of the company. We would suggest it’s time for Third Energy to pack up and leave completely. The last two weeks have seen four rejections of fracking applications in the north of England. The tide has turned against the industry, fracking is a dead duck.”
Source: statement

Superintendent Alisdair Dey, North Yorkshire Police

“Throughout this operation we have been balancing the needs and wishes of everyone at Kirby Misperton. We will continue to work with people on all sides of the issue, minimising disruption to the local community and ensuring protest activity is peaceful and safe.”
Source: statement

Friends of the Earth fracking campaigner Rose Dickinson

“This welcome news is a further blow to the fracking industry, and a major boost for everyone working to prevent fracking in Ryedale.

“Third Energy is now facing an in-depth government investigation into its financial health.

“Whilst fracking has failed to deliver for the last six and a half years, renewable energy has gone from providing a tenth of our electricity to supplying a third of it.

“The government should finally pull the plug on fracking: It makes no sense for our environment, our climate or our energy needs.”
Source: statement

Steve Mason, Frack Free United

“Yet again, we need answers. I question whether Third Energy have even prepared for the resilience test and have been found wanting, particularly in the case of the decommissioning work. It makes you wonder whether they consider it a priority at all.

“The reports of ‘enhanced gas flow’ is clear signal of intent that they want to frack across North Yorkshire. Every day the fracking rig is not in operation is a day to be celebrated. This saga drags on and on, let’s hope it is a happy ending for Ryedale and it does not end up a tragedy.”
Source: statement

Ian Conlon, Malton resident

“This is humiliating for Third Energy and a credit to the many thousands of local residents in Ryedale who have opposed fracking both through the planning process and in protests on the ground, devoting time and energy to protect their community from the devastation that large scale fracking would have.

“As a community we have closely monitored and delayed the role out of fracking, and it appears now to have been stopped dead in its tracks, at least in Ryedale. With INEOS also having failed to gain communities and councils support across a swathe of Northern England, we are determined to continue our campaign until all the fracking companies pack up their equipment and leave.”
Source: statement

 

26 replies »

  1. A limb gets removed … “it’s only a minor flesh wound” says the black knight aka GBK. (Ref. Month Python and the Holy Grail.) “Ineos is the one they call The One. You’d better watch out!”.

        • We’ve got a little list, we’ll cross them off the list, they’ll none of them be missed, they’ll none of them be missed……

          So what can we say? Third are relegated to fourth?
          It would seem that a rotting zombie fracking company shedding vital parts and non vital directors staggers towards the looming lemming cliffs. Or is that just another diversion?

          And what eventual benefit did that little futile exercise in obfuscation do for anyone but the overpaid and overvalued directors and the owners Barclays Banksters?

          Loss leaders? Experiments in financial futility and fraud? Artificial unintelligibility perhaps? Or just plain old tax avoidance scams and setting up a share crisis that can be exploited for profit and gain elsewhere?

          550 billion run on withdrawals in spite of a 1.5 billion bung? Shares crash and the worlds economy rocks and teeters on it’s ever more bizarre and unstable foundations?

          The last gasps or the first volleys? Perhaps both? Who can tell?

          And then, of course, we must not forget the requirement for a network of 4500m deep boreholes for the disposal of high level nuclear waste or indeed anything else without notification or knowledge to anyone?

          Scams within scams within scams within scams isn’t it?

          We were right to smell a rat from the beginning, there are more of those government licenced rats scattered across the long suffering north and south and east and west of England.

          Time to call a scam a scam and a lie a lie and expose the seven year switch perpetrated on the willfully and deliberately misinformed and maltreated and misdirected tax payer.

          As Robert Graves wrote in “I Claudius” “let all the worms hatch out”.

  2. I wouldn’t write off Third Energy just yet. Delaying tactics could play out in their favor given that Barclays Bank wouldn’t want the dubious distinction of being associated with first of a new round of fracking in the country. To step back and let Cuadrilla take the heat from that kind of ‘honor’, especially if things didn’t go well at PNR, seems at least to be a semi-sensible approach to dealing with that risk. Meanwhile returning plant sitting expensively idle is just basic economics. Whether they’ve got solid enough economic backing to bounce back remains to be seen.

    • Ahhh Philip shows a glimmer of common sense every now and again. You’re the Liberal Democrat in a swamp of Comrade Corbyns.
      Definitely my favorite anti, well Jack’s not too bad either although he is a little more naive, probably 20yrs between you age wise at least.
      Anyway, I admire you Philip for not being bullied and brought down to the standard anti level.

  3. Careful PhilipP. You will get attacked by the antis again for posting sensible logic.

    TE we have discussed before, is a bit of a sideshow. As such, I suspect Greg will want PNR operating as the guinea pig and then let TE follow their lead.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s