Angus proposes using abandonment cash to restart gas field production

Angus Energy

Investors and anti-drilling campaigners have criticised proposals by Angus Energy to use money intended for decommissioning to connect a shut-in gas field to the grid.

The company’s managing director, George Lucan, said Angus was considering taking on the operatorship and 51% of the licence of the un-named gas field in northern England

In an interview with IGUK yesterday, Lord Lucan said:

“We get with the asset a contribution toward abandonment liability of £2m and that will cover, more than cover, our tail-end liability which is 51% of abandonment. We can use that £2m right now to reconnect.”

He added:

“For £1 [the cost of the deal] we get a chunk of money for reconnection”.

An online presentation, posted on the Angus website yesterday, confirmed Lord Lucan’s comments.

“The Gas Field presents an opportunity for field rehabilitation and further development. Under heads of terms agreed the 51% share comes with a contribution to abandonment costs which we believe will cover our share of the costs required to re-establish production and reconnect to the National Grid without any immediate further funding required.”

One investor on an Angus Energy message board said he had never seen “any oil company dip into the abandonment pot to fund their drilling and/or production”.

He described the proposal as “crazy”, saying “the money [for abandonment] is kept separate and out of reach to prevent a company spending the money and then going bust leaving the government footing the entire bill”.

Campaigners against onshore drilling called for the decommissioning money to be “ring-fenced” in case Angus went out of business and was not able to pay for abandonment.

Lord Lucan said in the interview that the deal was at an “advanced stage”. He would not disclose the location of the gasfield.

But a statement to investors last month said the field had been in production “on and off” for 20 years. It stopped production in 2017, the statement said, when a nearby refinery terminal closed.

According to production data from the Oil & Gas Authority, the only gas field that stopped production in 2017 was Saltfleetby, near Mablethorpe, in Lincolnshire, operated by Wingas, owned by Gazprom.

In the interview, Lord Lucan estimated that the field still had 11-22 billion cubic feet of recoverable gas.

“If we close this deal, this is not an exploration project. These were producing fields with seven sunk wells, cost paid, just capped up for the moment.

“All we have to do is reconnect the thing and keep it working. It’s a job we can do very cheaply and very well and the vendor, it’s below their threshold.”

The Angus online presentation estimated a cost of £1m to install in-house gas processing and £0.5m-0.7m for a new 10 inch flowline to divert around current facilities and feed directly into National Grid.

Lord Lucan said the current owner was “an enormous company” and field was “of very little interest at the tail end of its life”

But for Angus, he said:

“For us, where we work with much, much finer costs, it’s a feast.”

Asked whether the deal would be a game-changer for the company, he replied “absolutely”.

Shares in Angus Energy closed down 4.4% today at 3.825p.

6 replies »

  1. What a shoddy company , taking another company’s abandonment cash to get them going , more like to pay the directors wages .

  2. I think this is beyond the pale. It shows desperation and makes you wonder at what lengths they would go to in order to meet their needs.

    • Dear me, what a farce? Perhaps in future, we should refer to the dodgy financial back flip somersaults of the onshore oil and gas operators as a “Fraudulent Angus Famine and Feast”

      F.A.F.F. for short, but not for long….

      Perhaps Angus should apply for ” sponsorship” from ineos? There seems to be a fossil fuel feast going begging there?

      Stranger things have happened, and Angus can always take a poll of their cycle teachers union to decide to refuse or not?

      But should they accept, they would require a much much bigger Ineos “Daily Fail” logo tee shirts though? Only a slight modification with a red crayon on a background of an upside down rig would suit that.

      XXXXL+ anyone?

  3. I guess that the Angus presentation, showing a picture of Theddlethorpe terminal, a picture of the field and production data would mean this is not a well kept secret.

    However, the agreement has yet to be agreed by the OGA, who may not fancy Gazprom ( the owner ) handing over the decommissioning cash for immediate spending. Though maybe it is 2 Million Roubles that is on offer rather than ££.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s