Industry

Cheshire Farmer: We’re under siege from two new IGas sites

Huw2

Two potential new drilling sites acquired by IGas in Cheshire have put meadows rearing a traditional breed of cattle “under siege”, the farmer says.

Star Energy, a subsidiary of IGas, has acquired the sites at Bridge Trafford within 500m of land used by Huw Rowlands to raise Red Poll beef cattle.

This morning, Mr Rowlands said:

“We are now under siege by IGas, who can frack beneath our entire farm assuming that they gain the relevant consents.”

“Given the powers that central government has assumed to over-rule any authority which opposes fracking, my fear is that the destruction of the farm and our herd of Red Poll cattle has moved a step closer.”

Mr Rowlands told us the two sites were about 800m apart on an unstable peat floodplain. He said:

“It could finish us off if they go ahead with fracking. Our cattle graze the meadows and drink out of the water courses and we know what happens to cattle in Pennsylvania that drink on land that is fracked.”

His farm at the The Grange aims to work in “harmony with nature” and uses little artificial fertiliser. It treats animals with veterinary medicines only when absolutely necessary.

Mr Rowlands said:

“If they were looking for the worse possible place for environmental damage from a fracking operation, then this is it.”

He said a geological fault runs across one site and there is a junction of faults beneath the other. One site was near the epicentre of an earthquake in 1750 which was one of the biggest on record in the UK, he said.

Cheshire Earthquake and fault

Star indicates epicentre of earthquake. Hashed lines mark geological faults. Red line marks site boundary. Locations drawn by John Murray

He added that one of the sites is near a drinking water borehole. Also nearby is a landfill site, two Victorian railway embankments and a high pressure gas pipeline that had shifted on its housing. He said the River Gowy flows through the meadows and then on to the Mersey Estuary, an internationally important site for wetland birds.

One of the sites is at the junction of Warrington Road and Ince Lane in Bridge Trafford. The other is on Morley Lane. There is no planning permission for hydrocarbon exploration or production with the sites and no applications are known to have been made.

The news emerged two months after IGas abandoned two nearby sites at Mickle Trafford and Upton. The company said the Ince Lane site provided an “option” for its operations. Results of seismic testing in the area would be used to decide whether it was suitable for gas exploration. The tests would also determine whether the target would be coal bed methane or shale gas.

A spokesman for the company said the industry had an excellent track record on health and safety and environmental protection. He told the Chester Chronicle:

“At IGas, we place the highest priority on the protection of the environment, and we have been doing so onshore in the UK for over 30 years.”

He said once the results of seismic testing were known the company would consult with the local people. IGas was, he said “committed to acting openly and honestly with the local communities”.

Mr Rowlands said IGas had not been touch with him. He said there had been rumours since last year that the company was looking for other sites. But this week documents from the Land Registry confirmed the purchases.

Opponents of IGas’s operations in Cheshire formed the Bridge Trafford Community Protection Camp page last week.

Bridge Trafford

Campaigners gathered at the site yesterday and there has been discussion of establishing a camp at the new site – though some argued this would be premature before a planning application was submitted.

Mr Rowlands said this morning he would “make lots of noise” about the sites to raise public awareness. He said he would also be collecting information about the geological faults.

He has made the meeting room at his farm available for anti-fracking events and is planning an open farm event in June. He said:

“It would be a good opportunity to highlight the threat IGas poses to our farm and the wider community.”

We’ll add links to the Land Registry documents soon.

6 replies »

  1. What does happen to cattle that drink on water on land In Pennsylvania? Big place, Pennsylvania, lot of land, lots and lots of cows. If Ruth had ever seen them in real life instead of on You Tube she’d know it. Has anyone ever got damages for what allegedly happened to cows? That may prove Mr Rowlands fears.
    I’ve been to Pennsylvania and I’ve seen shale gas wells on schools, the Pampers factory, state forests, and directly under dairy farms. I’ve just tweeted two pictures of farms. Perhaps Mr Rowland is right too. But perhaps my pictures tell the same story. Whose right? Certainly not Mr Rowland when he assumes anything bad in the UK in 2016/18 will automatically happen instead of exception that might happened in 2008 or 09

  2. So, to sum: Organic farmer has been shown literature and been freaked out. No applications have been put in and no planning permission granted. Seismics have yet to be conducted? Farmer knows of some ‘faults’ nearby. Doesn’t discuss the geology. Nothing about the faults 3D relationship with the geology, with the shale formations and/or any seal rocks. Nothing about if the faults are anywhere near the depth of any fracking, or how they relate to any pathways etc. No geophysics. Nothing about the basin structure. But a farmer says he has read about some faults nearby and he’s organic and doesn’t like the idea of fracking and so…. news.

  3. Seems like Mr. Rowlands has been anti fracking for a while (or at least a period of time 4 months ago)-

    http://www.tweetpuppy.com/redpollbeef

    If the protesters camp on I-Gas land without permission they should be evicted and prosecuted. Perhaps they should move onto The Grange where they will no doubt be very welcome. No risk of eviction and great meat to BBQ!

    What do these people do for a living? They must have very understanding employers. Sorry to be facetious.

    As mentioned in the previous comments, perhaps it would be prudent to wait for a planning application before predicting the end of the world.

    As I and several posters have mentioned before, the biggest polluters of our countryside are farmers.

  4. “One site was the epicentre of an earthquake in 1750 which was one of the biggest on record in the UK, he said.”

    What a surprise, scaremongering and exaggeration, straight out of the protestor playbook.

    As anybody can look up on google, the April 2nd 1750 earthquake was felt from Lancaster to Oswestry and being a century before the invention of a useful seismometer, the epicentre was guessed at Chester, being the largest town in thee area. Contemporary accounts described “a few bricks falling and several house bells ringing”.

    Its impossible to know the real magnitude but at 4.3 estimated from the local reports, it wasn’t even the largest earthquake in the UK in the year 1750, let alone on record.

    I have a certain amount of sympathy with the farmer as he is not going down the conventional farming route as he wrote in his letter to the Guardian 30 Aug 2015. However its clear that he has swallowed hook line and sinker the scare stories and mythology of the protestors. Its hard to tell if he is regurgitating the stuff hes been fed by others or believes it himself. Any drilling half a kilometer from his land will have no effect on him at all. Of course, its possible that every ill that befalls his land will henceforth be blamed on it.

    Earthquake reference: http://www.pascalbonenfant.com/18c/geography/earthquakes.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s