Updated: £200 access offer to residents for fracking seismic surveys – but who’s working for who?

Sefton Seismic testing

Recent seismic testing in Sefton for Aurora

A shale gas company is offering £200 to selected residents in the area around north Nottinghamshire who allow access to their gardens for seismic surveying in preparation for fracking.

INEOS, which holds at least seven shale gas exploration blocks in the area on the border between Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and South Yorkshire, has confirmed that it usually pays £100 for access and a £100 bonus for prompt agreements.

But residents may be forgiven for becoming confused about who is acting in their interests and who is acting for INEOS.

A firm of chartered surveyors called Fisher German Priestner Limited, also known as FGP, is working for INEOS as a land agent. FGP won a contract to secure access to properties for INEOS’s forthcoming seismic surveying programme.

DrillOrDrop understands that FGP has recently written to residents about seismic surveying in INEOS’s licence blocks in Nottinghamshire. The card, pictured below, was left on a field gate in the area on the border between north-east Derbyshire and South Yorkshire. When contacted, FGP said it wanted to include the field in a seismic survey.

FGP card edit

But a similarly-named firm of chartered surveyors, Fisher German LLP, has also written to some residents offering to act on their behalf in negotiations with INEOS. FiisherGermanLLP

Fisher German LLP has a 25% interest in FGP and one director sits on the board of both companies.

It now looks likely that two related companies will be on opposite sides of the table in any negotiations over access to land: FGP for INEOS and Fisher German LLP for any residents who take up its offer.

In its letter, Fisher German LLP said it had an interest in FGP but added:

“They are entirely separate businesses and we will be acting exclusively against FGP on this project, ensuring the best interests of property owners are protected”.

We asked Fisher German LLP a series of questions about its letter to residents. We asked how many people had received the letter, how did the firm know who to write to and what was its relation with FGP and INEOS Upstream. Our questions also included: What would householders who accepted the payments be required to agree to and would any payment indemnify damage caused by seismic testing?

Fisher German LLP refused to answer any of the questions. A spokesperson said:

“At this time Fisher German have no comment to make on the matter.”

DrillOrDrop put similar questions to INEOS. A  company spokesperson told DrillOrDrop:

“It would appear that Fisher German LLP did a bit of test marketing of its services by sending a mailshot to less than 200 households.

“INEOS has engaged Fisher German Priestner Limited (FGP) as our managing land agent in speaking to landowners about allowing our contractors to access their property to undertake seismic surveys.

“Fisher German LLP has a non-controlling shareholding in FGP, however they are two separate legal and business entities. INEOS Upstream has no contractual relationship with Fisher German LLP in relation to approaching landowners.”


In the letter to residents Fisher German LLP said:

“When you instruct us, our professional fees will be wholly payable by INEOS Upstream Ltd.”

But the spokesperson for INEOS told DrillOrDrop:

“As these are very simple access agreements we wouldn’t expect to pay for independent advice provided to homeowners. If there was a particular issue that needed expert consideration we would discuss those costs on a case by case basis.”

The INEOS spokesperson said with large estates, farms and industrial areas a land agent would often work on the landowners’ behalf.

“It is likely that Fisher German LLP among many other firms will have such clients and act across the table from us (and FGP on our behalf) in this capacity.”

INEOS said seismic surveying on large estates and farms would involve geophones and what it called “source points for creating sound waves”. This usually involves detonating small explosive charges.

But in gardens, the company’s spokesperson said: “We would only seek to place receivers to record sound waves.”

Flat fee and bonus

He added:

“We anticipate only a small percentage of householders in an area would be asked for access to their gardens and if granted a flat fee payment is customary. The flat fee is £100 for access plus a £100 bonus if the signed paperwork is returned by a certain date. The agreement does not indemnify INEOS from liability for damage if any is caused.”

“Disgraceful bribe”

A local anti-fracking group has described the offer of money for access as “bribery”. Sheffield Against Fracking said the payment was “disgraceful”, particularly following Theresa May’s proposal to make direct payments to households in fracking areas.

A spokesperson for Sheffield Against Fracking said:

“It seems that INEOS are attempting to bribe people in north Nottinghamshire with £200 to allow their seismic surveyors into gardens to survey the area.

“This on the heels of the Governments attempt to bribe people to accept fracking. People’s wishes and fears are not being listened to and the Government’s only stance on what they are doing to the people of the UK is to act as cheerleader and PR machine for UKOOG [the industry body UK Onshore Oil and Gas].”

Updated 30/8/2016 with photo of card left on a field gate in area on the border between north east Derbyshire and South Yorkshire

Updated 5/9/2016 to correct that Fisher German LLP is a firm of chartered surveyors, not a law firm.

13 replies »

  1. This does not seem to have been covered by the media at all? Why not? Please remember you can charge anyone as much as you want for access onto your land, or indeed a reply to a letter, you don’t have to accept their offer, its not a contract unless you agree to it, check the small print. i think one million pounds would about do it.

  2. What a bunch of kooks. A bribe is a payment of money that is made to convince someone to act dishonestly or illegally. One of the anti-factivists will have to explain to me how allowing a company to place seismic equipment in one’s yard is dishonest or illegal!

    As for Ruth’s story about the law firm and Ineos. it doesn’t seem above board, but it also seems like a bit of a tempest in a teapot.

    • It is important that people can make informed decisions. Presumably there will be accompanying paperwork which explains what what the seismic surveys are for. The industry states one multi well shale gas site would cost £333,000,000 to bring on line. Ineos figures suggest there will be ten wells per square mile. Whichever way you configure the sites/wells it is obvious that unconventional gas developments are heavy industries dealing with explosive and toxic material. A monitor in your garden does not necessarily mean a commercial site would develop in the immediate area but it does mean an interest in what is going on under your house. You can draw your own conclusions. I would ask Ineos to send me the exact locations of well sites that are proposed in a ten mile radius around my house and confirm that with land registry details so I could look at the details of the leases. Then you can decide if it is worth the £200 on offer.
      Of course this information may be available on the other side of the letter.

  3. John – presumably you are aware that seismic surveys are required before decisions to drill are made and well locations are selected? The seismic may result in no drilling in a particular area or even no drilling at all. If the well locations are already known why bother shooting seismic? It would be a waste of money. This is not a request to place monitors for fracking operation seismicity traffic light monitoring, just the array for conventional seismic operations.

  4. Fisher German LLP has a 25% interest in FGP and one director sits on the board of both companies.
    AND we are ok with this? No conflict of interest there at all………

  5. Fisher German LLP has a 25% interest in FGP and one director sits on the board of both companies.
    AND we are ok with this? No conflict of interest there at all………

    Based in the Northwest of England, we are committed to providing the most professional, dynamic and commercially sound service to our clients all over the UK. Fisher German Priestner Limited, known as FGP, was set up to act as specialist Chartered Surveyors in the utilities and infrastructure market. FGP brought together Fisher German LLP, a well established firm of Chartered Surveyors and Claire Priestner who has specialised in infrastructure and utilities for most of her 20 year career as a Chartered Surveyor. FGP has now stepped away from the Fisher German umbrella and operates as a standalone business with an ethos that revolves around representing the developer rather than the landowner.

          • LOL. Spoken like a true zealot in denial, Sherwulfe. When these operations come to town they create all kinds of service work, demand for housing, demand for new businesses. All you’ve got is negativity, no facts.

            • Sticks and stones hballpeen…

              ‘demand for housing’, who wants to live next to a frack site?

              ‘demand for new businesses’, only for the 100 – three, two, one you’re back in the room….

              P.S Might be interested in this……

              ‘Three of the world’s biggest insurers have called on G20 leaders to implement a timeframe for ending fossil fuel subsidies when they meet in China this week.

              The three insurers manage $1.2tn (£916.9tn) in assets. Aviva’s CEO, Mark Wilson, said: “Climate change in particular represents the mother of all risks – to business and to society as a whole. And that risk is magnified by the way in which fossil fuel subsidies distort the energy market. These subsidies are simply unsustainable.”

              But the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said this [the subsidies] doesn’t account for the damage to the environment and human health, for which governments carry the cost. The IMF estimates this to amount to a staggering $5.3tn a year, or $10m per minute.

              “We’re calling on governments to kick away these carbon crutches, reveal the true impact to society of fossil fuels and take into account the price we will pay in the future for relying on them,” ‘


Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s