Objectors to plans to explore for oil near Leith Hill in Surrey have accused the county council of trying to “smuggle through” unworkable arrangements for traffic.
The oil company, Europa, requires lorries delivering to the site at Bury Hill Wood to travel along Coldharbour Lane, which in places is steep, narrow and winding with high banks.
Leith Hill Action Group, which has been fighting the proposals since 2008, said yesterday the road could, in effect, be closed to non-site traffic during the development, which the company says will last 18 weeks.
Without independent evidence to prove otherwise, the group argued:
“People living on the lane will be trapped in their homes.”
It also said lives could be put at risk because of delays to emergency vehicles.
The traffic management scheme (TMS) is a condition of the permission granted by a planning inspector in August 2016.
According to the TMS, residents on Coldharbour Lane are urged to cooperate with traffic controllers who will marshal heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) many of which will be more than 40ft long.
“Those controllers will communicate with each other by radio – because there is no mobile phone service on much of the Lane. So how do the residents communicate with them?”
The group said the TMS did not address this and other concerns. There had been no analysis of the impacts on local people.
In a newsletter published yesterday, LHAG said:
“SCC [Surrey County Council] must require Europa to pay for an independent and open modelling exercise to be carried out to assess the viability and impacts of the scheme. Without that, SCC has no basis on which to wave it through.”
The group said until independent analysis proved otherwise, it believed:
- The knock-on consequences of traffic using other routes into Dorking would be chaotic and expensive
- Lives would be at risk as emergency services had to wait for site vehicles to negotiate the length of the lane or meet other traffic on narrower and longer alternative routes
- The bus service between Coldharbour and Dorking would cease
- Cyclists and horse riders would be at risk
The group’s chairman, Patrick Nolan, said:
“The inspector said, in effect, ‘I cannot see how this scheme can work; do it again’. Two years later we are presented with the same scheme. It won’t work.”
LHAG had expected the latest version of the traffic management scheme to be considered by councillors in September.
But the council has now told it that the TMS would be on the agenda for a meeting of the planning committee on 2 August. A consultation period will end on 31 July, after the shortest time allowed under council guidelines.
Mr Nolan said this meant “the abandonment of any pretence that SCC’s officers will pay any attention to what consultees and the public say”.
“The most outrageous thing about this attempt to smuggle things through is the fact that none of the concerns that we and other consultees have raised about what is missing from the TMS has been addressed.
“Our worry is that they [members of the council’s planning committee] will not refuse it, but instead just nod it through.”
Mr Nolan said the revised scheme would prevent HGV movements on a Saturday. He said:
“It further concentrates those movements, meaning that during the drilling period four HGV movements per hour will be necessary.
“75% of these movements will be of vehicles between 40 and 51 feet long, and 50% of them will also be over 9 feet wide and over 14 feet high. These vehicles can only travel one at a time.”
Mr Nolan also questioned whether the estimated number of HGV movements in the TMS – nearly 1,400 –was accurate. He said the number could be about 1,650.
He said LHAG had warned the council in May 2016 that it should allow enough time to consult people properly on the traffic management scheme.
“Given how much warning we provided to both Europa and Surrey County Council about the importance of providing enough time for the consultation on the TMS, it is simply inexcusable that we are now in a position in which they are trying to rush it through without proper scrutiny.”
LHAG is urging people to object to discussion of the scheme by councillors until independent assessments have been made.
- DrillOrDrop invited Surrey County Council to respond to the issues in LHAG’s newsletter. This post will be updated with any response.
[Comment removed by moderator]
Strange, you know, but no-one asked me whether I agreed to the local traffic plan whilst the solar farm was constructed, or the 300 houses in the village. It would be part of the planning application that all interested parties could comment upon. I know it doesn’t mean the end result will please everyone, but how is that different for any other development.
I presume this site is no different?
For those who wish to claim this sunken road is unique and management of traffic is impossible I would suggest a visit to Cornwall around Falmouth/Helford and research some 1944 history as to how a big part of the D Day invasion force was loaded through such access. You will see little sign left, so will need to do some research. Giggle may not be too helpful-try talking to local historians.
So, now in 2017 this country is unable to facilitate a miniscule fraction of what was done in 1944? Doesn’t seem very convincing to me.
No problem with access – in Papua New Guinea and Indonesia we didn’t need roads – we used heli rigs. Everything transported in by helicopter including all the rig components, casing, chemicals, drilling fluids, cement, test spread etc etc. Forget the nimby road and go by air, I am sure the locals would prefer this. Large staging base otherside of the subject road and two or three Chinooks to get everything in and out. Even the bulldozers for site prep go in and out by air. Much more exciting.
I see the PNR nanas are going to need to do a test and get a licence for their drone?
Taken in context, an entire nation behind the war effort to prevent the Nazis from overrunning the UK.
Or a single, for profit, oil company trying to make money for its shareholders by potentially ruining an area of outstanding natural beauty.
Plus, 70 or so years ago, with fuel rationing in place, there weren’t that many cars on the roads to actually manage…
When I worked in Africa we would bulldoze our access roads . That was fun . The locals didn’t mind as it provided safe roads through mine fields left after the civil war !