Regulation

Actors join residents to hand in objections to oil exploration at Broadford Bridge in West Sussex

 

bb-170809-postcard-hand-in-5.jpg

Sue Jameson and James Bolam. Photo: DrillOrDrop

Actors Sue Jameson and James Bolam were among a group who presented West Sussex County Council with a giant postcard today objecting to plans to allow more time for oil exploration at a site near Billingshurst.

The West Sussex couple joined campaigners opposed to the extension of planning permission for a year at the Broadford Bridge oil exploration site.

They handed the postcard to Lee Harris (pictured right, below), the council’s executive director of economy, infrastructure and environment outside county hall in Chichester.

bb 170809 postcard hand-in 3

Photo: DrillOrDrop

West Sussex granted planning consent for oil exploration at Broadford Bridge in 2013.

The site operator, Kimmeridge Oil and Gas Ltd (KOGL), drilled an exploration well in May this year.

KOGL now wants to wants to vary a condition of the 2013 planning permission which said the site must be restored within three years of the start of work.

Operations at Broadford Bridge began on 15 September 2014, which puts the deadline for restoration, under the current planning permission, at just over one month’s time. The company has said it needs more time to test the flow of oil in the well and has applied for an extra year.

A public consultation lasts until tomorrow (Thursday 10 August 2017). DrillOrDrop report

The company has argued that its plans would not “give rise to any new or additional significant adverse effects beyond those already considered within the ES [Environmental Statement submitted with the previous 2013 permission]”.

bb 170809 postcard hand-in 2

Photo: DrillOrDrop

But opponents of work at Broadford Bridge have said the previous permission is out-of-date and that KOGL should submit a completely new application. The company has been exploring for oil in the Kimmeridge limestone, while the previous application, by a past operator, was concerned with gas in sandstone.

Opponents have also said KOGL does not need another year at Broadford Bridge and they have criticised plans to use acid to stimulate oil flow, raising concerns about risks to groundwater and local wildlife.

Sue Jameson, who along with James Bolam, has been campaigning against the onshore oil and gas industry for five years, said she was concerned about flaws in the company’s applications and statements that were “not strictly true”.

“These are small things but they are indicative that the industry bends the truth to meet its needs.

“We are concerned about the potential industrialisation of the Weald and the effect on the environment and wildlife.

“The company has already said it needs to drill back-to-back wells to make the industry financially viable.

“I don’t want my grandchildren to live in an area where water or air may be polluted.

“We don’t need fossil fuels. It is a fantasy that they are an interim solution.”

James Bolam said:

“You only need to look at the web at sites in Pennsylvania and Texas to see the massive amount of destruction. It is not just one or two wells – it is hundreds.

“This is a beautiful green and pleasant land and we want to keep it so.”

He said more people knew about the onshore oil and gas industry than when he first started campaigning. But he said many people did not know about what was planned in the Weald.

“The media refuses to discuss it. They will not tell people about it. The government will not tell people, and the oil companies are not going to tell people what could happen.”

The group also included nine-year-old Adam Cort, who displayed his poster, which won an award in March from WWF.

bb 170809 postcard hand-in 4

Adam Cort. Photo: DrillOrDrop

His mother Carrie Cort, a WWF climate ambassador, said:

“Why are we drilling for oil and gas? We have committed to the Paris agreement to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions but we seem to be investing only in nuclear and oil and gas.

“We should be supporting the green economy. We are we not investing in renewables?”

Reporting this event was made possible by donations from individual readers of DrillOrDrop

9 replies »

  1. Nimbys-fib.

    Suspect they will boycott using Gatwick next. They’ll be gone when panto starts, and they don’t need to find a “cause” to remind us they are still around. But, that’s me being cynical-I’m sure they are experts in their field-whatever it may be.

  2. I trust Mr. Bolam is better at researching love scenes, than he is at researching the oil industry, otherwise his deviation onto American web sites might cause offense to many in the audience!

    Why would anyone want to reference US oil wells regarding this site? If oil is produced, it will go to Fawley refinery. Does Fawley not already have one significant on shore site in UK supplying oil (Wytch Farm) that could be referenced as what this site could look like? Just inconvenient that visitors report to me this is an ideal example of an “industrial” site existing for many years within an area of outstanding beauty, surrounded by wild life, and unknown to many locals, who benefit (or not) from some of the highest house prices outside of London.

    Don’t underestimate your audience, some of them actually concentrate on your performance.

  3. Some more hoity-toity’s getting upset by the nonsense put out there by the pink haired antis and thinking by turning up with a placard all development will cease. Haha.

  4. I like the wind turbine in their posed photo. I suppose they would object to the Weald being covered in them too. It is a fact that if we go to a completely renewable electricity supply, with current technologies, vast tracts of the British landscape would need to be covered in wind and solar farms. Plus their will be a 13% increase in power demand by 2040 due to electric cars.

    • ….or cover everyone’s roof with solar? Cut down excessive consumption.
      Northern France have turbines in their cereal fields. There is a good argument for putting the turbines up and growing around them.
      A turbine is preferential to a dirty rig, possible flaring and definite light/noise pollution. No dirty HGVs. I understand they are like marmite, you either love or hate them, but the alternative is no countryside at all….it will be underwater or burned to a crisp….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s