Updated: Onshore licence moves to production without drilling a successful well

Broadford Bridge 170614 DrilorDrop14small

Broadford Bridge site in PEDL234 in West Sussex. Photo: DrillOrDrop

An onshore oil and gas licence in southern England moved into its production phase this week. But the operator has not yet drilled a well in the area that has been proved to be successful.

In a separate development, the Scottish Government has extended the initial phase of a shale gas licence for a second time, despite a preferred position against fracking.

No productive well

DrillOrDrop has learned that a licence held by UK Oil & Gas (UKOG) in West Sussex and Surrey moved into the final or production term on 1 July 2019.

But so far, UKOG has not drilled a productive well in the area. There also appears to be no field development plan for production.

The licence, PEDL234, was granted in 2008. A UKOG subsidiary, Kimmeridge Oil and Gas Limited, began drilling an oil exploration well at Broadford Bridge in West Sussex in May 2017.

In June 2017, the company announced a successful recovery of rock core and in July “highly positive ground-breaking results”.

“Unproductive” and “sub-commercial”

171223 Broadford Bridge drone 4 BBAG

Broadford Bridge exploration site, 23 December 2017. Photo: Broadford Bridge Action Group

But a month later, DrillOrDrop reported evidence that a mechanical sidetrack had been drilled to avoid problems in the wellbore. One section of the well had to be abandoned because of wash out zones.

In October 2017, UKOG announced cement bond problems. In December 2017, the company said a section of the reservoir was unproductive because of low permeability.

The Broadford Bridge well was suspended in March 2018 after the company described flows in the target Kimmeridge formation as “sub-commercial”.

UKOG submitted a planning application in April 2019 for another exploration well in the licence area, at Loxley, near Dunsfold in Surrey. But progress through the planning system could be delayed because the company recently gave notice of a second application for the same site with an alternative access track. A decision on the original Dunsfold application is not expected until at least August 2019.

Field development plan

PEDL234 has moved into production apparently without a field development plan, in what seems to be against official guidance.

UKOG is not required to submit a field development plan for the licence area until December 2023 – well into its production term.

But the Oil & Gas Authority’s Consolidated Onshore Guidance says:

“a licence will expire at the end of its second term unless the OGA has approved a field development plan.”

The OGA describes the field development plan as the “support document for the OGA’s development and production authorisations”.

The movement of PEDL234 also appears to be against the Petroleum (Production) (Landward Areas) Regulations 1995.

Schedule 3, section 5 (2) says licences can continue after the second or appraisal term if the secretary of state has either approved or served a programme of work on the licensee.

“Parliamentary protection being thwarted”

A spokesperson for the local community group, Protect Dunsfold, said:

“The Loxley planning application seems to be asking to restart exploration, as well as pioneer new methods, chemicals and “stimulation techniques”.

“It seems very wrong that, at a decision point where the process says the license expires or transitions into production but only with a fully agreed Field Development Plan, this license becomes a 20 year production licence while the operator pleads for exploration permission.

“When the PEDL system was introduced the phases were time-limited for a good reason, to limit the blight on the area while exploration is carried out but now that protection, inserted into the process by parliament, is being thwarted by questionable decisions by the OGA.”

Are there other “non-productive” licences?

The OGA told DrillOrDrop it did not publish details of which term licences were in. But it said the expiry dates of licences were updated on an online database, as they were agreed.

At the time of writing, this database has details of nine licences, including PEDL234, where the appraisal or second term is said to have expired on 30 June 2019. The licences are included in the updated list of work programmes so they have not been rescinded or quashed.

Of the nine licences, operators of five, in addition to PEDL234, appear not to have drilled successful oil or gas wells.

These include:

  • PEDL181 where Europa’s Kiln Lane-1 well was found to be water-wet in 2015 and plugged and abandoned without further drilling
  • PEDL201 where Egdon Resources drilled at Burton on the Wolds in 2014 only to announce less than a fortnight later that the formation was water-bearing and the well was being plugged
  • PEDL209 where Egdon Resources reported in 2016 it was abandoning the Laughton-1 well because hydrocarbon shows were “not sufficiently encouraging to warrant testing”
  • PEDL202 and PEDL246 where the OGA records show no wells have been drilled during the periods of the licences

We asked the OGA whether these licences had in fact moved to production and how this was justified without drilling successful wells.

The OGA replied:

“In accordance with the licence conditions, and having agreed Retention Area Plans, these licences have continued into their third terms.

“Being in the Third Term of the Licence does not entitle the Licensee to any different regulatory requirements than in the Initial or Second Term.

“Any activity including drilling, testing or production will as always require landowner agreement, local planning authority permission, EA permits and HSE scrutiny before the OGA considers granting authorisation.”

Extension to Scottish licence

The Scottish government has confirmed that it has extended for a second time the initial exploration phase of a shale gas licence held by Ineos Upstream and Reach Coal Seam Gas.

This phase of the licence had been due to expire on 30 June 2019. But the companies had asked for an extension.

In a letter sent last week, the Scottish Energy Minister, Paul Wheelhouse, said PEDL162 had been extended for another 12 months.

“It would have been a dereliction of our responsibility as a competent licensing authority not to consider the request for an extension, taking into account all the relevant factors.”

Paul Wheelhouse 180515

Paul Wheelhouse

The Scottish Government has a “preferred policy position” not to support unconventional oil and gas extraction in Scotland. That remains unchanged, Mr Wheelhouse said:

“No local authority can grant planning permission for any proposed fracking or coal bed methane project without advising Ministers, which then permits us to call the application in and we would defer any decision on any planning application … until the policymaking process on our preferred position is completed.”

A consultation closed last month on a Strategic Environmental Assessment and Business Regulatory Impact Assessment on the policy. The licence extension would “allow a period of time for the conclusion of the policy-making process and the licensees to consider their position in the light of the finalised policy”, Mr Wheelhouse added.

The Ferret news website reported disappointment in the extension from Friends of the Earth Scotland, Scottish Greens, the Broad Alliance of community groups opposing fracking and the campaign group, Frackwatch.

Ineos and Reach took unsuccessful legal action in 2018 against the Scottish Government policy.

Other extensions

Angus Energy has reported that the second term of its Balcombe licence, PEDL244, in West Sussex has been extended for a further year, until 30 June 2020.

The second phases of other licences, also due to expire last month, also appear to have been extended to 2020, according to the OGA database. These include PEDL164 in west Lancashire, PEDL165 in the Fylde and PEDL200 in north Nottinghamshire.

6 replies »

  1. Over 50000 barrels from Horse Hill is what I would call ‘productive’ Drillordrop haven’t a clue!!!

    • Hi Clive
      Horse Hill is in a different licence area from Broadford Bridge. Although they have the same operator, the licence areas are treated separately by the OGA.

      This article refers to the Broadford Bridge site and its PEDL area, PEDL 234.

  2. This should not come as a surprise considering that the OGA’s objective is to support the industry in maximising the economic recovery of oil and gas. At Brockham, the OGA gave consent in late 2016 to drill a well despite lack of planning permission and, it appears against its own guidance, which said that planning permission should have been in place before OGA could issue its consent ( Less than a year later, the OGA gave Angus Energy consent to produce from this well, despite a clear-cut letter form the planning authority to the OGA confirming that it was unauthorised and did not have planning permission to produce hydrocarbons ( Thanks to this publication for documenting it all in so much detail.

  3. Ruthy

    Should do a little more research before pedeldling her half truthths imo.

    A little research shows that subsequently UKOG have been given till 2022 to test the Weald Kimmeridge & until 2023 to come up with a development plan.

    So lots more planning applications for testing being requested by the government to develop the onshore oil & gas industry in a constructive Manner for the benifit of the whole UK.

    Hopefully the County Councils will play ball, dissipating the scoundetious blight of this constant fracking claim which could not be further from the truth as seen & explained.

  4. This article is all over the place. You have said at the start of the article “DrillOrDrop has learned that a licence held by UK Oil & Gas (UKOG) in West Sussex and Surrey moved into the final or production term on 1 July 2019.” Much further down the OGA have replied to your query “In accordance with the licence conditions, and having agreed Retention Area Plans, these licences have continued into their third terms.Being in the Third Term of the Licence does not entitle the Licensee to any different regulatory requirements than in the Initial or Second Term.”.
    What is the point of the article? You have stated false assumptions then proven them incorrect?

    Then there are the bold headers, without proper analysis, stating:
    “No productive well”
    “Unproductive” and “sub-commercial”
    “Are there other “non-productive” licences?”.


    • Hi bridging
      As made clear in the piece, the comments “unproductive” and “sub-commercial” refer to the Broadford Bridge well, and are quotes from UKOG’s (the well operator) own assessment of the well.

      According to the OGA’s own guidance, a licence cannot move into the third (production) phase until the OGA has approved a field development plan for the licence. (See page 10, OGA Consolidated Onshore Guidance) This is (among other things) meant to ensure that the operator is working to extract oil and gas in the licence area.

      The article states that PEDL 234 (which contains the Broadford Bridge site) has moved into the production phase, although there is no producing well in the PEDL, and, as far as we know, no Field Development Plan has been submitted. This appears to go against the OGA’s own guidance, something which they do not address in their response which appears in this article.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s