“Caravan of love” fracking trial dropped “in public interest”

pnr 180522 Ros Wills 7

Caravan blockade at Preston New Road, 22 May 2018. Photo: Ros Wills

The trial of 12 anti-fracking campaigners who parked a caravan in front of Cuadrilla’s shale gas site has been abandoned.

The case had been expected to go to Preston Magistrates Court on Monday (22 June 2020), more than two years after the incident.

But the Crown Prosecution Service wrote to the defendants yesterday to say that the charges in the case had been discontinued.

The formal notice said:

“The decision to discontinue these charges has been taken because a prosecution is not needed in the public interest.”

A CPS official said the trial would not now go ahead.

The case, which became known as the “Caravan of Love trial”, dates back to 22 May 2018.

Opponents of Cuadrilla’s shale gas operation at Preston New Road near Blackpool parked a caravan in the site entrance and locked themselves to it. The site access was blocked to some vehicles for 41 hours.

There were multiple delays to the case coming to court. One defendant died during the preparations. Monday’s hearing was also thought to be in doubt because of the coronavirus outbreak.

One of the defendants, Tina Rothery, who had been charged with wilful obstruction of the highway, said today:

“The burden of this case on our shoulders all this time has been a heavy weight, as it would be for any concerned resident who had to resort to this sort of activity in order to safeguard our children, community and environment.

“A ‘day in court’ would, of course, have been an opportunity to again make clear the disparity between what is justifiable and what is perceived as criminal.

“The law is used as a stick to beat campaigners when influential, government-supported industries crash their way into unwilling communities. This waste of public resources is an abuse and a mockery of justice. Cuadrilla did not tell the truth of potential consequences when they applied for planning and then went on to not only breach planning but cause the earthquakes we were protesting about. The bad behaviour was always from them.

“I’d go so far as to request a ‘thank you’ from the government and justice system for what we did to prevent harm and court cases that would have come from those harmed. Would we do it again? Of course.”

This was one of the last major court cases arising from the near-daily protests outside Preston New Road, which began in January 2017 and continued until fracking was suspended after earth tremors in August 2019.

7 replies »

  1. How many times have trials been dropped because they have undercover police or police informers charged alongside activists? It happened at Gleneagles G8 also for the Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station case [edited by moderator] to name but two. How many were involved with this case? 3/4?

  2. Fracking was put on Moratorium following multiple Hydrofrac Earthquakes over the 2019 August Bank Holiday weekend culminating in a property damaging 2.9 Hydrofrac Earthquake on Bank Holiday Monday.
    As the British Geological Survey call all the seismic activity around the Fylde this century Hydrofrac Earthquakes surely we should do the same?

  3. Peter K Roberts. Call it ‘fluffy bunnies’ if you like. The fact is Cuadrilla drilling and Fracking, caused Seismic activity chichi led to an Earthquake which was felt by the people of Blackpool, and damaged properties as far away as Lytham St Annes. Francis Egan, is on record as saying that he could ‘Personally Guarantee’ that there would be no Earthquakes.

  4. Have to agree with Cynthia Spectrum. How surprising that such a high profile campaigner as Tina Rothery had her trial delayed for 2 years and then quietly dropped “in the public interest”, when identical cases for other high profile campaigners are pursued on police instructions even when the CPS briefs that there is insufficient evidence?

    • I agree Jon – she should have gone to trial – definitely in the public interest. Plenty of evidence apparently.

      • Just researching this event, and it’s amazing how the comments focus on the CPS irregularities in this case. I predicted it would never get to court right at the start. Why, because the action was in the week leading up to Cuadrilla applying for an injunction, in line with INEOS. Of course, the trusted colleagues of RTP had gone home, so more evidence was required. [Edited by moderator]. I’m just finishing my book, and It is the final nail in the coffin. A coffin that already has dozens of nails in it.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s