UKOG threatens libel action against councillor

The company behind plans to explore for gas near a Surrey village has threatened to sue a senior local councillor for libel.

Stephen Sanderson, chief executive of UK Oil & Gas plc. Photo: DrillOrDrop

UK Oil & Gas plc (UKOG) has accused Waverley Borough Council’s executive member, Steve Williams, of corporate defamation over a statement he made that was used in a local newspaper.

The statement was in a council press release issued last month (8 June 2022). This responded to the government decision to grant planning permission for UKOG’s gas exploration proposals at Loxley, near Dunsfold.

Cllr Steve Williams, Waverley Borough Council

Cllr Williams, the portfolio holder for environment and sustainability at Waverley, was quoted expressing his disappointment at the decision and his concerns about the implications of granting planning permission.

Waverley’s response was reported by the Haslemere Herald, BBC News, the Independent and other media outlets.

UKOG’s solicitors, Hill Dickinson, sent a letter of claim dated five days later to Cllr Williams alleging his statements to the Haslemere Herald were defamatory.

Cllr Williams has rejected the allegations and made a statement defending his comments. Solicitors acting for the council have formally responded to UKOG’s legal team. The council press release is still online. 

UKOG also sent a letter of claim to the Haslemere Herald. The paper has responded to the allegations and offered UKOG the opportunity to put its case in print but said it has heard no more.

This is not the first time UKOG has threatened libel action against local people.

The Loxley site is in the same licence area (PEDL234) as the UKOG wellsite at Broadford Bridge, near Billingshurst.

In May 2017, UKOG accused Keep Billingshurst Frack Free of making defamatory comments in a newsletter.

DrillOrDrop asked UKOG whether it was pursuing its action against Cllr Williams and the Herald, or any other media outlets. We’ll update this article with any response from the company.

4 replies »

  1. UKOG are a joke , I might decide to Sue them over the contents of my subject access request where they had made up 3 different versions of what to tell the papers about me at Dunsfold , I have all the paperwork 😂😂😂

  2. Well, good luck with that Jono. But, recalling some of your posts on this site about individuals I would suggest you don’t go there. Your choice but that would be my advice otherwise your wedding could be severely curtailed.

  3. His investors make defamatory comments about him all the time, nearly all residents do who live in the vicinity of his ‘projects’, environmentalists will produce evidence of the harm his company does and plan to do, so why go after this one individual?

  4. Not sure others making defamatory comments are any excuse in law, Paula C.

    As with all planning applications there is a consideration of harm versus benefit. Environmentalists and others can suggest harm, but they ignore benefit. Others don’t. I don’t feel any defamatory comment helps the argument either way. Over excited people need to get themselves under control.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s