This page has links (in red) to detailed reports on the public inquiry into Ineos’s application to drill for shale gas at Woodsetts in south Yorkshire.
The company was twice refused planning permission on 8 March 2018 and 7 September 2018. Rotherham Borough Council has defended its refusal on the grounds of noise and local amenity. Earlier this year, it dropped an objection on highway safety and traffic.
Dates: 11-14 June 2019 and 18-21 June 2019. Opening day begins at 10am
Location: Riverside House, Main St, Rotherham S60 1AE
Parties: Ineos (appellant), Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (defendant), Woodsetts Against Fracking (Rule 6 party)
Rally: Campaigners against Ineos plans are due to gather outside Riverside House from 9am on the opening day of the inquiry (11 June 2019)
Appeal reference: APP/P4415/W/19/3220577
Address: Land south of Dinnington Road, Woodsetts, South Yorkshire
Key facts and timeline: DrillOrDrop page
Inspector: Katie Peerless
Ineos barrister: Gordon Steele QC
Rotherham Borough Council barrister: Jon Darby
Woodsetts Against Fracking barrister: Jack Parker
Ineos witnesses: Andrew Buroni (health); Chris Hazell Marshall (air quality) David Goold (geology); Duncan Russell (water); Kevin Martin (traffic), Luke Prazsky (environmental permitting); Matthew Sheppard (planning); Tom Pickering (operations); Paul Macrae (landscape); Steve Fraser (noise)
Rotherham Borough Council witnesses: Anthony Lowe (planning); Andrew Lockwood (landscape)
Woodsetts Against Fracking witnesses: Katie Atkinson (planning); Gerald Kells (traffic); David Sproston (noise); Richard Scholey (local impacts)
Live news updates from the inquiry
Day 1: opening statements, speeches from residents and Woodsetts Against Fracking transport evidence
- Ineos caused consternation in Woodsetts when announced a 3m acoustic barrier running 250m in the weeks before the inquiry
- The fence would create a sense of enclosure, campaign group says, and would need its own planning application
- Even with the barrier, Ineos could not meet noise limits, council says
- Ineos indicated last night that the acoustic fence may not be needed
- Site noise would have a significant adverse impact on residents, says council, and threaten sleep disturbance
- Site route is not safe or suitable, inquiry told
- Ineos says the scheme is not about fracking and anti-fracking campaigners are “in the wrong place”
- The shale gas scheme is for a very limited period, he says, and is entirely reversible, Ineos says.
- Complaints to the inspector that residents have not been consulted on the noise barrier
- Ineos accused of failing to communicate with people in Woodsetts
- Resident says the site is opposed by villagers, parish council, Rotherham council and the South Yorkshire police and crime commissioner
- Proposed bellmouth is the front drive of a Woodsetts resident, inquiry told
- CPRE calls for the inquiry to be adjourned until people have time to see the latest evidence from Ineos – the inspector says no
- Complaints that poor sound quality in the inquiry room is preventing some people from participating in the hearing
- Woodsetts Against Fracking (WAF) transport witness disagrees with the council that the site access is safe and suitable access
- WAF’s transport witness says a road width of 6m is required for two HGVs to pass safely
- Inquiry hears 6 out of 70 measurements of road width on the lorry route were under 6m
- Shared access road to the proposed Ineos site is a concern, inquiry told
- Ineos says the route to the site is safe and suitable
- Ineos transport witness says it is not necessary to consider predicted traffic flows during school drop-off and pick-up times
- Convoys could be used for heavy goods vehicles but the size has not been decided, Ineos tells the inquiry
- Peak lorry movements would double on Dinnington Road, inquiry told.
- Ineos says this would be for a short period of time
- Ineos transport witness declines to say where lorry staging areas would be because it is commercially-confidential information
- Ineos has not considered pedestrian movements on the lorry route because the shale gas site would not change pedestrian movements
- Ineos witness says there are nothing in the Woodsetts project that would cause health impacts.
- Inquiry told that the Ineos scheme would not discriminate against protected groups and a project-level equality assessment was not necessary
- Ineos traffic witness questioned about how residents who would share the site access track would get to and from their homes.
- Residents complain that the proposed noise barrier would block visibility of other vehicles on the access track
- Tom Pickering, Ineos executive, says the proposed noise barrier would cost about £100,000.
- Rig hire would cost £18,000-20,000 per day, inquiry told
- Drilling the Woodsetts well could cost £8-£10m
- Inquiry told the first Woodsetts heard about proposed drilling in the village were injunction notices around the site – Ineos executive apologises
- Ineos says a condition specifying a particular rig would be wholly unreasonable
- Residents and ward councillor complain they have not been contacted by Ineos about the Woodsetts plans
- More complaints about the late submission of a proposed noise barrier
Recent DrillOrDrop articles
Ineos appeals against Woodsett shale gas refusal (10 January 2019)