Losing the fight against fracking is not an option, campaigners told

Anti-fracking groups from across the UK, gathering in Balcombe this afternoon (19/1/14), were told they had to win the battle against shale gas.

The Green MEP and French farmer, Jose Bove, told a rally outside Cuadrilla’s oil exploration site in the village:  “Losing is not an option. For the sake of the next generation, we must fight until we win.”

He said anti-fracking campaigners had to grow into a national movement. “What is important is to gather more and more people and change the view at the national level.”

Mr Bove said there was an opportunity in the upcoming European and national elections to challenge politicians about their support for fracking. “When politicians are afraid to lose their place in parliament they are going to change the way they think.”

He said the UK had become a symbol of the fight against shale gas. “You are in the middle of the picture and you have to stay there until the victory.

“You are right to fight and you have to win this fight. Climate change is the most important issue of the future and you will not be able to fight climate change if you do not fight shale gas.”

Another Green MEP, Rebecca Harms, of Germany urged the groups: “You cannot talk enough about it.” She said “You must be strong and smart.” The meeting also heard from the UK’s Green Party leader, Natalie Bennett. She described as “desperation” the government’s decision to give 100% business rates from shale gas sites to local councils. David Cameron, she said, was losing the argument. “We can win this fight in the UK and across Europe. Lets go out and do it.”

Campaigners occupy drill site

3 replies »

  1. “Climate change is the most important issue of the future and you will not be able to fight climate change if you do not fight shale gas.”

    While it’s true that climate change is important as it really is happening, its nothing to do with human activity and even less to do with shale. And the climate is likely to get colder, not warmer, due to the sun going into a new Maunder Minimum. We are potentially looking forward to winters when the Thames will freeze over.

    Even if we took the climate scientists models (nothing is empirical, its all modelled) at face value and worried about CO2, using shale will mean an immediate reduction of CO2 as it replaces coal. See the US for proof of that. Switching to renewables also requires backup for when there is no sun or wind. Hydro power can’t provide that, gas can, so even with renewables shale gas will still be required.

    • “…so even with renewables shale gas will still be required.”
      Yes I agree with you there. I’m not too sure about the global cooling idea, but you may be right- I’m no expert.
      I wrote an article last summer when the anti-fracking protests were reported heavily in the media, and I think you, as well as the writer of this blog, might find it interesting.
      (If you jsut click on my username you will be redirected straight to my blog.)

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s