Breaking: Not guilty verdicts in the Horse Hill anti-fracking protest trial

Redhill magistratds

Nine anti-fracking campaigners have been found cleared of obstruction following protests outside the Horse Hill exploration site near Gatwick Airport.

District judge William Ashworth, sitting at South East Surrey Magistrates Court in Redhill, said he accepted that local drivers would have been delayed by the protests but he said:

“I cannot say that I am sure that you went too far”

The verdicts were met with applause, cheers and shouts of “You’re a good man.”

The charges relate to protests outside the Horse Hill exploratory drilling site during flow testing in February and March 2016.

Isabelle Bish, Thomas Burke, Paddy Horne, Stephen Jackson, Neil Lamony, David Powter, Daniel Nye, George Stubbs and another man all denied obstructing the highway during protests to slow down lorries arriving at the site or leaving.

DrillOrDrop has chosen not to identify the ninth defendant after he said he had received personal physical threats from people who he said called themselves investors in one of the Horse Hill companies.

During a week-long trial, the prosecution argued that the protests caused delays to road users and were therefore unreasonable and unlawful.

But the defence teams argued the protests were proportionate and did not break the law. They pointed to evidence that police commanders gave inconsistent guidance on what level of protest would be tolerated. They also said police officers were inconsistent in the way they applied a five-step warning system before protesters were arrested.

Full report

DrillOrDrop always welcomes comments on posts. In order to keep the comments area safe and legal, DrillOrDrop has a new commenting policy which you can read here.

Categories: Uncategorized

19 replies »

  1. Tony Seaton, are you deliberately being a bit dense and blinkered there because it suits your cause? ….I suspect you are.
    It is obviously a matter of context and proportionality isn’t it.
    If you want to come and protest against me or anyone or anything else you are of course at liberty to do so. Then if I think you actions are unreasonable or unlawful, I will complain in the appropriate loo places, and it will be address from there. It may well be that at some point a judge has to make a call on if you had acted in a reasonable manner…..
    …just like he did in these cases, where his view was that the protesters had acted in a way that was reasonable and proportionate to the situation at all times.

    Please also note, it was the actions of the police that he found to be unreasonable and disproportionate to the situation. and that is far from the first time they have been critisised by a judge after anti-fracking protest related arrests.
    So, at risk of entering into a contentious area, I suggest it is them who need to learn how to behave themselves a bit better.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s