Campaign group urges police to stop N Yorks fracking over threat to bats

170918 KM8 Red Shell

Campaigners outside Third Energy’s Kirby Misperton fracking site on 18 September 2017. Photo: Michelle Easton

In a last attempt to stop fracking at Kirby Misperton, Friends of the Earth has asked North Yorkshire Police to investigate whether bats will be at risk from Third Energy’s planned operation.

DrillOrDrop has seen correspondence in which the environmental organisation says the test frack could harm species of bats which are protected by law.

Friends of the Earth (FoE) has told North Yorkshire’s Assistant Chief Constable that a full investigation must be carried out before any operations at the fracking site begin.

The force should also contact Third Energy to prevent any further operations on site until the investigation had been concluded, FoE has requested.

According to the correspondence, FoE said planning permission had been granted on the incorrect assumption that the area was devoid of bats. But it was now known that there were significant numbers of protected bats and a real risk of harm to them.

In a statement, North Yorkshire Police said:

“We have received correspondence from Friends of the Earth raising concerns about protected species of bats at Kirby Misperton. We are working with Natural England and other relevant organisations to determine the next steps in relation to this issue.”

On Friday last week (15 September 2017, FoE launched a petition to stop work going ahead.

Bats have the highest level of protection in wildlife law. It is an offence to kill or injure a protected species, damage or destroy its place of shelter or deliberately cause disturbance. (Disturbance is anything likely to impair their ability to survive, breed, rear their young or hibernate or affect a local population.)

A wildlife method statement for Third Energy concluded that there would not be any adverse effects on foraging or commuting bats.

But FoE said the full impact of harm to bats had not been assessed by the developer, which plans to carry out operations on the site for up to 21 weeks.

Britain’s rarest bat, Alcathoe’s bat, is found in Ryedale, one of only two places in the UK. According to FoE’s experts, it could forage in the Kirby Misperton area and is prone to disturbance from light pollution.

The first equipment was moved on to the Kirby Misperton site yesterday (19 September 2017). Fracking is waiting for approval of Third Energy’s hydraulic fracture plan from the Environment Agency and Oil & Gas Authority and final consent from the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

The Kirby Misperton fracking site is expected to be lit during the operation and will experience what FoE described as “a very significant increase” in activity.

Bat features near KM8 JBA Consulting for FoE

Bat features near the KM8 site. Report by JBA Consulting for Friends of the Earth, July 2017

FoE commissioned its own report in July 2017, which concluded that Third Energy’s bat surveys lacked data, had not sufficiently assessed surrounding habitats and came to “unreliable” conclusions.

The FoE report concluded that operations at the site could interfere with the bats’ ability to feed and drink and travel to foraging grounds or roosts. This would make it harder for the local population to survive, the report said.

The authors said North Yorkshire County Council, which granted planning permission, and Natural England, the government’s wildlife adviser, could not have confidence that the fracking operation would not disturb bats and enforcement action should be taken if construction work started.

Third Energy response

A spokesperson for Third Energy said:

“Third Energy is not able to comment on the specific content of the correspondence sent by Friends of the Earth to the North Yorkshire Police as the company was not copied.

“However, the protection of wildlife, including bats, was specifically addressed in the planning process.  With operations at the KM8 wellsite starting in September, Third Energy will complete a further survey in accordance with the planning consent.

“It should be remember that the KMA well site itself has been there since 1985 and provides no suitable places for bat roosts and limited foraging opportunities, because of the hardstanding and existing wellsite infrastructure.  Full details of the local bat population is available in the Wildlife Protection Method Statement


26 replies »

  1. But the worms will attract moles, so there will be little “synthetic” fracking required because the moles will have conducted a level of “natural fracking”! And the moles will be drawn to KM8, so removing themselves from local gardens thus reducing damage to lawns and increasing property prices! Will Third Energy have wised up to this potential-less sand more worms!? And with winter approaching, free waist coats at the end of it.
    Nature is a wonderful thing.

    Have a good weekend.

  2. Strange that Ken Wilkinson is ever present on this site and regularly mentions FoE ‘failed miserably when I questioned em on the factual basis of their complaints against fracking’ ad nauseam, but he has failed miserably from answering my line of questioning about hard evidence.
    While the KMA wellpad is clearly a large lump of concrete and therefore unsuitable for either nesting or foraging for bats, the KMA site extends to the surrounding woodland – that’s why it’s there. Pro frackers clearly know this as they often quote how well screened it is. The previous 20 years of production will have rarely included greatly elevated levels of noise and light, which the fracking operations will. In line with clear legislation about avoiding disturbance to bats, an assessment should have been made about the impact of this planning consent (and any previous ones for the same site of course). However, the report submitted by Third Energy stated that the site was ‘devoid of bats’. Their choice. If any bats are subsequently negatively affected, this would be a criminal offence. Unless of course you believe that some laws should be upheld and other ignored?

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s