Politics

Government points to planning change for major shale applications

 

Fracking Week in Parliament

A senior member of the government has flagged up plans to take major shale gas decisions out of local council control.

Andrea Leadsom told the House of Commons last week:

“Major shale gas planning decisions will be the responsibility of the national planning regime.”

Ms Leadsom, the Leader of the House, was responding to a call for a debate on large shale gas applications by the North East Derbyshire MP, Lee Rowley.

His constituency includes Marsh Lane, one of the sites earmarked by INEOS for shale gas exploration.

The company has accused Derbyshire County Council of unreasonable delay in deciding the application and has lodged an appeal for non-determination.

The decision will now be made after a public inquiry by a planning inspector or the Communities’ Secretary.

The Conservative Party manifesto at the 2017 general election included a proposal to bring major shale gas applications into the national planning regime, to be decided by government, rather than local councils. It also proposed classing non-fracking oil and gas applications as permitted development – without the need for planning permission. Neither proposal was included in the Queen’s Speech.

A spokesperson for the Communities and Local Government Department told DrillOrDrop:

“The government is considering how it will bring major shale planning decisions under the national planning regime and will announce our preferred way forward in due course.”

Policing anti-fracking protests

 

The Policing Minister, Nick Hurd, confirmed that Lancashire’s Police and Crime Commissioner had applied for special grant funding for the cost of policing the anti-fracking protests outside Cuadrilla’s Preston New Road site. He was responding to a question by the shadow policing minister, Louise Haigh.

Shale gas, air pollution and climate change

Baroness Featherstone

The Lib Dem’s energy spokesperson, Baroness Featherstone, raised the issue of air pollution and impacts on climate change from burning fossil fuels.

She told a debate on the global effects of climate change:

“We are not on course to meet our commitments in the fourth and fifth carbon budgets and, extraordinarily, the Government are still licensing more exploration for North Sea oil and gas and are encouraging—nay, reliant on—the shale gas industry filling the gap left by their lack of policy boldness. What are they thinking of, creating a new fossil fuel with one hand while signing the Paris agreement with the other?”

She said the government must stop subsidising fossil fuels.


Transcripts

With thanks to TheyWorkForYou.com

Lee Rowley, Conservative, North East Derbyshire

Following the recent experience in my constituency where a planning application for exploratory drilling that will lead to fracking has been declared for non-determination in a highly premature manner, may we have a debate in Government time about whether the planning system is working for these kinds of large applications?

Reply by Andrea Leadsom, Conservative, South Northamptonshire, Leader of the House of Commons

My hon. Friend is a strong voice for his constituents, and he is right to raise this matter. An applicant for planning permission can exercise powers under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for a right of appeal to the Secretary of State against a decision to refuse consent, or non-determination. Whether an applicant wishes to exercise that right of appeal is a matter for them. He will appreciate that major shale gas planning decisions will be the responsibility of the national planning regime, so he could raise this with Department for Communities and Local Government Ministers during questions on 22 January.

Link to transcript 21 December 2017at


Question by Louise Haigh, Labour, Sheffield Heeley, Shadow Policing Minister

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if her Department will ensure funding from the public purse is provided for the full cost of the policing of the fracking site in Lancashire.

Reply by Nick Hurd, Conservative, Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner, Policing Minister

The Lancashire PCC has submitted an application for Special Grant funding for the costs of policing the anti-fracking protests in Lancashire. This is currently being reviewed by HMICFRS and a decision will be made in due course.

Link to transcript 18 December


Extract of speech by Baroness Featherstone, Liberal Democrat, Energy Spokesperson

We rich nations have a super-responsibility to the world, but also to ourselves. We are suffering health impacts too. Poor air quality, mentioned by my noble friend Lady Walmsley and the right reverend Prelate, is just one example. The main culprit for it is fossil fuel air pollution, which is not helped by the discovery that diesel is equally bad. We are not on course to meet our commitments in the fourth and fifth carbon budgets and, extraordinarily, the Government are still licensing more exploration for North Sea oil and gas and are encouraging—nay, reliant on—the shale gas industry filling the gap left by their lack of policy boldness. What are they thinking of, creating a new fossil fuel with one hand while signing the Paris agreement with the other? According to the Health and Environment Alliance, the health cost of fossil fuels in the UK every year is £23.2 billion. This Government must stop subsidising fossil fuel, as must Europe. Although as a Liberal Democrat I am obviously a Europhile, it is not perfect in this and has just made some decisions with which I disagree. It is a first.

It is absurd for Greg Clark to launch the Clean Growth Strategy and say we are leading the world in fighting climate change when the facts on the ground, such as the scrapping of the £1 billion competition, which has been mentioned, the measures in the Budget and fossil fuel subsidies scream the absolute opposite

Link to transcript, Debate on global effects of climate change, 21 December 2017

22 replies »

  1. The government are having their strings pulled by their oil and gas industry donors and cronies. The investors are panicking and having cold feet. Cue the government to demonstrate that they have every faith in fracking. They change the planning rules to suit them. They change the safety rules to suit them. They change the rights of local voters and the Human Rights of citizens to suit them. And this is what they call “Strong and Stable!!!” Pathetic.

    • Sorry Pauline, the safety rules are very strong for what is a low risk form of drilling. How do ‘human rights’ come into it?
      A local council will not have the decision on a major infrastructure project, so why should local councils have these ridiculous political arguments on shale gas based on fake science? Reminder, this was just over a year ago, yet many will still campaign on these proven falsehoods. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-38499811
      In the US I gather they can get permission to drill in a couple of weeks. Why the years and years of timewasting from councils for what will be a ‘permitted development’. The science doesnt change after all, and the EA make sure everything is public and safe.

  2. Why the shock/horror? This has been known for many months and is a re-iteration of a previously defined policy. Either most of the antis are not as knowledgeable as they try and make out, or they see repeated “news” and have to have a repeat howl of shock/horror.

    Intimidation of the companies to be managed by injunctions, intimidation of the local authorities to be managed by removing the decisions from them. 2018 should be interesting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s