Regulation

Campaigners question statements on West Newton well test

191014 West Newton WNGTGF3

West Newton-A wellsite, 14 October 2019. Photo: West Newton Gateway to the Gasfields

Statements made by partners in the oil and gas well at West Newton in East Yorkshire have prompted opponents to question future plans for the site.

Reabold Resources and Union Jack Oil said last week they were “awaiting regulatory” approval for a revised test on the site’s second well, known as WNA-2.

The original test was suspended in August 2019 when liquid was seen in the well, along with the expected gas. The partners said at the time this represented a “significant oil and gas discovery rather than a pure gas discovery” but required a redesigned well test.

On 18 December, Union Jack Oil made a formal statement to its shareholders on the WNA-2 well test. It said:

“The partners are currently preparing for the extended well test operation, readying equipment and awaiting regulatory approvals. Once said approvals are received, the equipment will be mobilised to site at the earliest opportunity and the EWT will re-commence.”

On 19 December, Sachin Oza, co chief executive, Reabold Resources, told an interview:

“So what we’re currently waiting for in the near term is the appropriate regulatory approval.”

But it appears that the site operator, Rathlin Energy, had not yet applied to vary the environmental permit. DrillOrDrop understands this is the regulatory approval that may be required to test the well for oil, as well as gas.

The Environment Agency (EA) told a local campaign group in an email written just before 8am on 20 December 2019:

“At the time of writing Rathlin Energy has still not yet requested to make any changes to their testing of the West Newton A-2 well and have not applied for an environmental permit variation.

“Whether an environmental permit variation will be required for any proposed changes will depend on the specifics of those proposals.”

A spokesperson for the West Newton monitoring and information group, said:

“As part of the monitoring process we contacted the EA following statements from Union Jack Oil and Reabold Resources.

“From the EA’s response, we believe the partners are game playing with their investors”

In a statement to DrillOrDrop, the spokesperson said:

“It shows a complete lack of respect for the people of East Yorkshire, and brings into question yet again the integrity and honesty of Rathlin and its investors.

“We will continue to monitor all activity and hold them to account.

“We are grateful for the transparency and ongoing communication from the EA and Health and Safety Executive so we are able to keep the local community informed.”

3 replies »

  1. If the West Newton Group think that the Rathlin Partners are playing a game with their investors, why would they want to question the honesty and integrity of those investors?

  2. If the West Newton Group took the time to read the minutes of the last Community liaison meeting, they would obtain the details of the future plans for both sites and also see that a discussion took place over the messages that the investment companies were putting out.

    Rather than questioning the honesty a and integrity of Rathlin and its investors who are not responsible for these press releases, perhaps it would be wiser and make more sense, for local residents to question the honesty and integrity of a group who claim West Newton is a fracking site?

  3. Lets face it, [edited by moderator] Pete Hamilton and Darren Dennett are hardly qualified to comment on anything at West Newton except takeaways. These two clowns insisted it was a fracking site for months and were forced to change it to “exttreme acidisation site” to try and make it sound dangerous. If it is dangerous then why does Yorkshire Water use the same technique on its water bore-holes in Yorkshire.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.