Charges dropped against Horse Hill protesters

Four people who took part in a protest at the Horse Hill oil site in Surrey in June have said their actions have been vindicated after charges were dropped.

Protest at Horse Hill wellsite in Surrey, 1 June 2020. Photo: Used with the owner’s consent

The Crown Prosecution Service told the two women and two men their cases had been discontinued because there was “not enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction”.

But the campaigners, all members of Extinction Rebellion, have said there was abundant photographic evidence reported by news outlets.   

Margaret Mulowska, 33, from Staines and Venetia Carter, 56, from Brighton, locked themselves together across the entrance gate. They denied obstruction.

Simon Sinclair, 30, and Christopher Smith, 43, from Kingston, climbed over a fence into the site and unfurled a “climate emergency” banner. They denied trespass.

Their trials had been expected during 2021.

Lock-on protest at Horse Hill oil site in Surrey, 1 June 2020. Photo: Extinction Rebellion

Mrs Carter, a tutor, said:

“I was astonished that my case was dropped for this reason.  I pleaded not guilty because I understood that I had a right to peacefully protest against the extraction of oil at this site as continuing to burn oil can only lead to more climate upheaval.

“There is plenty of photographic evidence that we took this action so I’m bemused that there is ‘not enough evidence’.”

Social worker, Ms Mulowska, said:

“Is dropping charges a tacit admission that UKOG are the real criminals here? Even the tanker drivers that day, and the arresting officers who dealt with us, were on our side.”

Mr Sinclair, a trainer of volunteers, said:

“For me, dropping these cases shows that, not only should our actions be deemed not criminal, but firmly in the public interest and for the public good.

“This is clear vindication of our actions by the authorities, and show that actions like this are necessary to avoid future environmental and societal collapse.”

Mr Smith, a renewable energy engineer, said:

“This signals to me that the courts are becoming less inclined to uphold prosecutions against peaceful and meaningful protest that seeks to highlight the climate emergency.”

In the past 12 months, there have been a number of slow-walk and lock-on protests, as well as occupations at Horse Hill.

Surrey County Council granted planning permission for 20 years of oil production at the site on 11 September 2019. A two-day hearing earlier this month challenged the council’s decision (DrillOrDrop reports here and here). The judgement was reserved to a date to be fixed.

A civil injunction remains in force at the Horse Hill site, prohibiting trespass. UK Oil & Gas plc, the owner of site operator, said after the June protest:

“Dependent upon the outcome of any criminal prosecution, the Company is considering whether to seek committal hearings for the individuals for the blatant injunction breach.”

11 replies »

  1. I suppose this will upset those who were saying “Lock them up “ Ah well, UKOG are not having a lot go their way are they?

  2. Hahaha…. jono your daft as a brush 🧹 you really think UKOG care about the protesters being locked up? The big failure in this case is that the protesters will continue to gain unauthorised access, until they put their own lives or others lives in jeopardy and then there is gains to a potential fatality!!

    There’s Not many brains being utilised here, Note: don’t go where your NOT welcome!

    • Then you had better stay at home, how much did it cost UKOG for the useless injunction? The company is nothing but a joke 🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠

  3. A renewable energy engineer???

    Trying to inconvenience, and cost the opposition. Not so laudable as some would try and present. Happens in many industries. Then, observed by the customers who decide that the alternative must have issues.

    Save the planet? No, save a bigger chunk for me.

    Says a lot about many renewables. Need to stop the opposition to make them look “attractive”. Hardly surprising when stopping the press who print something you dislike, or don’t print the message you like, is another part of the platform. 2020s in UK or 1930s in Germany?

  4. From the JPT

    “UAE Boasts Significant Unconventional Reserves, Approves ADNOC’s 5-Year Budget of $122 Billion

    The UAE produced 4 million B/D this year and is looking to these newly discovered resources to reach 5 million B/D by 2030.”

    And you lot run rpund like headless chickens trying to stop 400B/D wells. Get on a plane!!

  5. But, Daniel, you have missed more of the message. All that the UK does will be an example for the rest of the world to follow!

    Does it? NO. But hush, that has to be avoided.

    So, let’s stop conventional on shore oil in UK and UAE can frack away to supply, producing more emissions as it does so.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s