protest

Climate camp at proposed gas drilling site in Surrey

Opponents of fossil fuel extraction in Surrey have set up a climate camp on land proposed for gas exploration.

Photo: Dunsfold Climate Emergency Camp

The site, near the village of Dunsfold, is at the centre of a planning dispute between local people and the drilling company, UK Oil & Gas plc (UKOG).

Planning permission for gas exploration was refused twice last year by Surrey County Council. A nine-day public inquiry closed in mid August 2021 and a decision is still awaited.

The group behind the camp said they today would stay until UKOG’s plans were refused.

Photo: Dunsfold Climate Emergency Camp

Dunsfold Climate Emergency Camp said in a statement this morning:

“We are here to peacefully stop UK Oil & Gas from drilling for oil and gas on this land and to prevent them from industrialising our countryside. We aim to do this with least disruption to the local community and whilst minimizing our environmental footprint.”

The statement said:

“The decision to go ahead with the camp in these unprecedented times due to the global Covid-19 pandemic has not been taken lightly but given the climate and ecological emergency that we are also facing we feel that we cannot afford to stand by and do nothing.

“After an application for drilling was twice turned down by Surrey County Council last year, UK Oil & Gas appealed to the Planning Inspectorate. An inquiry was held in July, but the final decision has yet to be announced. If the appeal is turned down, we will gladly disband the camp but until then we will be here.”

The statement referred to comments made in August 2021 by the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres. He described the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as a “code red for humanity”. He also said the report “must sound a death knell for coal and fossil fuels, before they destroy our planet”.

Photo: Dunsfold Climate Emergency Camp in Surrey

Dunsfold Climate Emergency Camp said:

“The continued extraction and burning of fossil fuels is a major contributor to climate change.

“Research shows that the carbon dioxide released from burning the oil, gas and coal in already-operating fields and mines globally will push the world far beyond 1.5°C of warming, the temperature above which leading climate scientists warn of catastrophic climate events.

“The message is clear – fossil fuels must be left in the ground.”

The group also referred to comments made by the International Energy Agency in May 2021. It said there should be no new oil and gas fields from now if the target of net zero emissions by 2050 were to be achieved.

The group added:

“Yet from the Cambo Oil field off the coast of Scotland, Whitehaven coal mine in Cumbria, to Horse Hill oil field in the south of England, new fossil fuel extraction plans continue to be pursued in the UK. This cannot be allowed to continue. We are here to stop this happening in Dunsfold.”

DrillOrDrop invited UKOG to comment on the camp. This article will be updated with any response.

At the Dunsfold public inquiry, UKOG said national and local policy recognised “a compelling need” for the continued exploration and exploitation of new gas reserves.

UKOG’s barrister, David Elvin QC, said the Dunsfold scheme was “an essential plank” and a “pre-requisite” of the government strategy to reduce carbon emissions. He told the inquiry:

“government energy policy requires the continuation of a security energy supply and the production of gas notwithstanding climate change issues and the move towards net zero by 2050”.

A High Court injunction is in force against protests at the UKOG site at Horse Hill, also in Surrey.

28 replies »

  1. “(P)er- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were readily used at fracking sites across the US” reported the Guardian on July 21st., last – https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/21/toxic-forever-chemicals-pfas-fracking
    Today’s Guardian confirms that it is feared that 120,000 US sites handle these extremely dangerous chemicals and that  oil and gas operations are those industrial sectors most likely to be involved –
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/17/us-epa-pfas-forever-chemicals-sites-data
    The chemical sector has a lot to answer for where fracking and public health are concerned. 
    Although I simply do not know whether the chemical giant INEOS is involved in the supply of such chemicals to the oil and gas industry, it is encouraging to discover that the chemical industry is attempting to redeem its reputation – heavily tarnished ever since Rachel Carson’s 1962 ‘Silent Spring’, and that INEOS is investing $2.3b in green hydrogen production in Europe. Given the history of this company, this move looks very welcome and should be watched closely.

    [Word added at poster’s request]

  2. Well, as what is suggested is followed by I simply do not know, then perhaps if chemical usage is considered then consider the sanitizers supplied freely to the NHS in the UK by Ineos during the pandemic, and to other countries.

    Always better to concentrate upon what is known rather than what is not known.

    Meanwhile, in USA the current high and still rising oil price is encouraging a weekly increase in the number of oil rigs being deployed-just Giggle US oil rig count. So, it would appear that someone-and a lot of someone’s-have calculated that winter is coming and the high cost of oil could be a real problem to many, and mid terms are on the horizon. Not just a few greedy people but even Biden who appealed to OPEC to lower oil and gas price without any result.

    What is known again. Given the history of this company, they back winners most of the time. (Not always with sport, but that is for fun.)

    Very interesting comment from Sir Jim recently:

    “Electric cars are ideal for city centres and short journeys. But, hydrogen is much better for longer journeys and heavier loads and that requires immediate investment in hydrogen distribution and hydrogen filling stations”.

    I agree, and fuel duty on hydrogen is simple and straight forward. I suspect the guy has it right again or it could just be he has a hydrogen vehicle to flog shortly. I go for the former, the antis will go for the latter, otherwise they have a whole stack of redundant devil masks on their hands.

    Good job that profit allows the guy to invest though.

Add a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s