East Yorkshire – Page 6 – DRILL OR DROP?

Decision due this month on major expansion of East Yorkshire oil site

By Ruth Hayhurst on September 14, 2021 • ( Leave a comment )

Proposals for long-term oil production and six new wells at a Rathlin Energy site in East Yorkshire are due to be decided at the end of this month, it was announced today.

Formation damage reported at West Newton-B well

By Ruth Hayhurst on August 31, 2021 • ( 9 Comments )

Suspected damage to the target formation at Rathlin Energy’s West Newton-B site in East Yorkshire is limiting hydrocarbon flow, two of the partners said this morning.

Councils’ joint fight against Rathlin Energy expansion and production plan

By Ruth Hayhurst on August 19, 2021 • ( 2 Comments )

East Yorkshire villages are to work together to oppose plans for expansion and production at an oil and gas site.

Major onshore oil production application published

By Ruth Hayhurst on July 13, 2021 • ( 6 Comments )

Detailed plans for one of the UK’s largest onshore oil production schemes in recent years have been published.

Rathlin posts notice of application for West Newton oil production

By Ruth Hayhurst on June 25, 2021 • ( 6 Comments )

Rathlin Energy has given formal notice that it intends to apply for planning permission for expansion and long-term oil production at one of its sites in East Yorkshire.

Rathlin pledges to cut daily tanker numbers in West Newton plan

By Ruth Hayhurst on June 5, 2021 • ( 4 Comments )

Rathlin Energy has said it will reduce the daily number of tankers visiting its proposed oil production site in East Yorkshire, in response to public concerns.

West Newton B well test – equipment mobilised

By Ruth Hayhurst on May 24, 2021 • ( 1 Comment )

Rathlin Energy has confirmed that it began to mobilise equipment today to complete and test the well at its West Newton B site in East Yorkshire.

Call for suspension of permit changes at East Yorkshire wellsite

By Ruth Hayhurst on May 18, 2021 • ( 5 Comments )

New rules at an East Yorkshire oil and gas site should be suspended because of alleged inconsistencies by the environmental regulator, a resident has argued.