Regulation

INEOS legal case against National Trust takes another step forward

Clumber ParkNottinghamshire

Clumber Park Nottinghamshire. Photo: Richard Watson

The UK’s biggest shale gas company is expected to issue court documents in the next few days in its legal challenge against the National Trust over access to Clumber Park in Nottinghamshire.

INEOS Upstream wants to carry out surveys for shale gas in the Grade 1 historic park. But the National Trust has refused access. It said INEOS had not demonstrated why the surveys were necessary.

In February, the Oil and Gas Authority, acting for the government, granted permission to INEOS to bring its case against the Trust.

The company was at the High Court this afternoon for a hearing to make arrangements for the challenge – the first of its kind for nearly 40 years.

INEOS said a letter and court papers would be sent by the end of next week to anyone with an interest in the land at Clumber Park.

The company has committed to carry out 100km of 2D seismic surveys and 100km2 of 3D surveys as a condition of its petroleum exploration licence (PEDL) that includes Clumber Park. The survey will help INEOS decide where to drill and frack for shale gas.

PEDL308 workprogramme

Extract from licence for PEDL308, which includes Clumber Park

INEOS said previously that the seismic surveys were not intrusive and represented no threat to the park. The survey was in the national interest and, in refusing access, the National Trust had behaved unreasonably, INEOS has said.

The National Trust has said INEOS had “not yet followed the proper planning process, which would involve them fully considering the potential environmental impacts”. The Trust also said it had no wish for its land to “play any part in extracting gas or oil”.

Today’s hearing was told that Clumber Park made up only about 15% of the PEDL. But INEOS’s barrister, James Hanham, said access was needed to avoid inaccuracies in the survey.

INEOS is bringing the case under the Mines (Working Facilities and Support) Act 1966. This allows courts to allow access to other people’s land to search for or extract oil and gas if it is “expedient in the national interest” and it is not “reasonably practicable to obtain the right my private arrangement”.

INEOS told the court it had identified anyone with an interest in the land within Clumber Park, such as tenants, property owners and licencees. As well as the National Trust, this includes the Caravan Club, an electricity substation and trustees of a cricket club, the court heard.

Mr Hanham said INEOS proposed to write informing the people on the list about the case and the right to object.

He said participants in the case should be limited to people with a direct interest in the land. Chief Master Matthew Marsh, the senior court officer at today’s hearing, agreed:

“Just because it is expedient in the national interest, the whole nation does not have a right to comment.

“This is a localised interest in the land.”

The deadline to submit objections is 8 June 2018. There will be a further hearing on 13 July 2018 to decide which people who have objected will be allowed to participate in the case.

Chief Master Marsh rejected INEOS plans to install notices about the challenge on posts around Clumber Park. He also said it was not necessary to advertise in a local newspaper.

INEOS agreed to put most of the court papers on a dedicated website, to which only the people contacted by the company would have access.

Chief Master Marsh said the case should be classed as a category A – one of great substance or difficulty or of public importance. It would be decided by a High Court Judge, he said, at a hearing at which witnesses were likely to be called to give evidence and to be cross-examined.

Representatives of the National Trust and the Oil & Gas Authority did not take part in today’s hearing.

  • INEOS is challenging Rotherham Borough Council at a public inquiry starting on 24 April over the non-determination of its application for shale gas drilling at a site at Harthill. The company will also be challenging Derbyshire County Council in June for the same reason over an application at Marsh Lane. Two campaigners are seeking to go to the Court of Appeal over INEOS’s injunction against anti-fracking protests.

Reporting at today’s hearing was made possible by individual donations to DrillOrDrop

36 replies »

  1. please we can not allow any test or fracking to happen the damage it causes and leaves behide its damages wildlife the earth and kills people and animals with the chemicals used and left behide and of course INEOS dont care about anyone but themselves we have to BAN fracking everywhere in the uk

  2. Back to the point. Is it up to INEOS to decide what is “expedient in the national interest”? And why should Chief Master Matthew Marsh state ““Just because it is expedient in the national interest, the whole nation does not have a right to comment.
    “This is a localised interest in the land.”? If it is stated to be in the national interest, then surely the whole nation does indeed have a right to comment. And even if it is not “in the national interest”, are we to be denied a right to comment?
    It seems to me that an application to frack because this is deemed by INEOS and government to be in the national interest needs a little more justification than is provided, justification, that is, other than a government mantra which appears to ignore the greater good of the planet’s interest.
    Is not the question,should the perceived and unproven ‘national interest’ be allowed to trump the planet’s interest? It is not in the interest of humanity or of the planet that new sources of fossil fuel should be explored with a view to exploitation. Once shale is discovered in quantities deemed commercially viable then “lock in” will occur, and the source will be exploited until exhausted, regardless of effects on those least able to resist them.
    Please wake up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.