Teaching union votes against Ineos sponsorship of the Daily Mile

Chesterfield SSP fun run

Independent fun run in north east Derbyshire in 2017. Photo: Chesterfield Schools Sports Partnership

The largest UK education union has formally opposed Ineos sponsorship of a children’s running scheme because of the company’s interests in fracking for shale gas.

The Daily Mile encourages children to run or jog for 15 minutes every day, with the aim of making them fitter, healthier, and more able to concentrate in the classroom.

The National Education Union (NEU) said it supported the idea of the Daily Mile, with its reported benefits for physical and mental health.

But the national executive voted this month to object to Ineos’s sponsorship, now in its third year.

Amanda Brown, Deputy General Secretary of the National Education Union, said:

“The NEU is opposed to fracking which encourages reliance on fossil fuels and takes the focus away from investing in renewable forms of energy. It is not the solution to the UK’s energy challenges.

“The young people taught by our members recognise this and are demanding change, as witnessed when thousands of students walked out of school to demand climate justice as part of the youth strike 4 climate movement.”

A map on the Daily Mile website indicates that more than 5,000 UK schools have signed up to the initiative. The scheme’s website, name and logo are trademarks of the Daily Mile Foundation, with the same Hampshire address as the Ineos Group.

Ineos Upstream holds the largest number of licences for onshore shale gas exploration in the UK.

Ms Brown said:

“The NEU fully supports the notion of the Daily Mile and its intention of improving the physical and mental health of young children, instilling in them a lifelong habit of exercise.

“However, we strongly object to Ineos sponsorship of this initiative. Ineos holds multiple licences to frack for shale gas and, for the sake of the planet and particularly our children’s futures, we need to move quickly away from a carbon economy.

“We are also concerned about the manufacture of plastics by Ineos; many of the children taught by our members are alarmed at the effect of plastics on marine life.

“Schools are beginning to discover that the Daily Mile is sponsored by a company which is profiting from climate change as a significant player in the oil and gas market, and as a result are withdrawing.

“Sponsorship by Ineos will not encourage participation in the Daily Mile. We would urge Ineos to consider its position and Daily Mile to urgently seek a replacement sponsor.”


Last week, a climate change action group, Parents for Future, invited members to ask schools participating in the Daily Mile to withdraw and join an alternative scheme.

Ineos also sponsors the children’s Go Run for Fun initiative, as well as cycling’s Team Ineos, Ineos Team UK (Britain’s 2021 America’s Cup sailing challenge) and the Eliud Kipchoge attempt to break the two-hour marathon.

DrillOrDrop invited Ineos to comment on the NEU vote. This post will be updated with any response.

102 replies »

  1. And speaking of plastic pollution, here is a curious item by David Kesteven of The Fracking Farmhouse on Ineos claim that their plastic streamers, meant to scare birds away from nesting habitats in Harthill prior to there squatting there, that the streamers were blown away by the recent gales into a nearby hedge, and were cleaned up by the locals, and asked ineos what they wanted to do with them. They then had a nasty comment from Ineos saying that it was “vandalism” and was being investigated??!!

    When crazy Ineos claim that the north wind is now a vandal and is being investigated, they really have lost the plot. Gaslighting without any gas? The sheer arrogance and officious attitude of ineos has to be seen to be believed.

    And they wonder why their sponsorship attempt for the Daily Mile initiative was refused by the Teachers Union?

    This is The Fracking Farmhouse – Gaslighting Harthill



    • Oops! I think i have just upset Martian! Sorry Martian, i didnt mean to take the top of the page, Honest Engine!

      Never mind, i am sure your cheque will be cleared soon, and then i will be shifted out of the top of the page limelight…again….Ha! Ha!

  2. Excellent news. This greenwashing by [edited by moderator] Ratcliffe and his cronies should not be allowed, and it’s about time teachers stood up to it. For one of the world’s biggest polluters [edited by moderator] to pretend to care about childrens’ health is a disgrace.

  3. Exactly, Ellie. All Sir Jims products should be piled up in the school yard and set alight, whether the children want their I Pads, mobile ‘phones, computers etc. to go up in smoke or not! That worked well in history, didn’t it? Books then, plastic suppliers of communication now.

    Suspect, as in history, it would leave those who excite the action still able to enjoy usage themselves-so look forward to your next plastic contribution. Meanwhile, the children can cope with water purity issues and lack of medicines-that should give them something to add to their appreciation of history and health.

Leave a Reply to Phil C Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s