Legal

Government fracking policy faces more legal challenges

 

170830 RCJ court of appeal day 2

Photo: DrillOrDrop

The government is being challenged in the High Court this week over its planning policy on fracking.

The campaign groups, Friends of the Earth and Talk Fracking, are seeking judicial reviews of the revised National Planning Policy Framework, issued on the final day before the parliamentary summer holiday in July this year.

The framework, also known as the NPPF, sets the policy for planning decisions across England, including onshore oil and gas projects.

It said mineral planning authorities should put in place policies to “facilitate” the exploration and extractive of onshore oil and gas, including unconventional hydrocarbons like shale gas. It also said local authorities should recognise their benefits of these sites for energy security and a transition to a low-carbon economy.

Friends of the Earth will argue on Tuesday (December 18) that the revised NPPF had no regard to environmental impacts and that it posed a risk to the climate and environment.

The framework was unlawfully adopted, the organisation will claim, because the government did not do a strategic environmental assessment (SEA).

Friends of the Earth wants to force the government to carry out an SEA, which, it said, could help to identify different approaches to achieving UK climate emission targets. The organisation also wants the government to consult the public and modify the framework based on those findings.

Will Rundle, Friends of the Earth Head of Legal, said:

“The government’s national planning framework, which directs development in every single community in England, has never been environmentally assessed. This makes a mockery of the government’s green credentials and undermines sustainable development.

“In reality, the government simply does not know how much damage its national flag-ship planning policy could cause.

“The government’s failure to undertake any environmental assessment of its national planning policy, not only dangerously threatens our already warming climate and is, we believe unlawful, but shows contempt for people and planet.”

“Breaching duty of care over evidence”

Joe Corre 3

Joe Corre. Photo: Talk Fracking

Talk Fracking, led by the fashion designer and environmental campaigner, Joe Corre, has accused the government of basing the NPPF on what he said was outdated evidence.

DrillOrDrop reported earlier this year that the organisation had said the Local Government Secretary, James Brokenshire, had “blindly incorporated” the instruction to local authorities from what was described as a “flawed written ministerial statement”.

This was originally issued in September 2015 by the then energy secretary, Amber Rudd.

In an interview with the Canary, Joe Corre, accused ministers of breaching their duty of care to take account of scientific developments:

 

“They didn’t look at any evidence, even though Talk Fracking had supplied new evidence that showed that, far from it being a bridging fuel, [shale gas] actually exacerbates climate change and is a major contributor to climate change, particularly through the methane issue.”

He said recent scientific developments indicated there was no argument left for any kind of fossil fuel bridge to a low carbon economy.

“We have to go straight to it and we have to go with it very quickly.

“But the minister simply restated the position without looking at the evidence. Not only that, they said that they didn’t need to look at the evidence. That is just plain wrong in law.”

Mr Corre said Talk Fracking hoped to force Mr Brokenshire to look at the evidence on shale gas and climate change and carry out a public consultation.  He said:

“We are trying to hold government and ministers to account and to exercise the duty of care that they are required to do. They have tried to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes and push these things through without people being able to do anything about it.”

The cases are due to be heard at the Royal Courts of Justice on the Strand in London on Tuesday morning (18/12/2018). The court and start time will be confirmed later this afternoon. DrillOrDrop will be reporting from the hearing.

10 replies »

  1. Nice banner!

    Anyone know where it is now please, went missing in action last summer?

    This Court Action will, by raising awareness in a Brexit fiasco focussed period, will help educate the so far unaware of the damage being done by the fossil fuel extraction and burning industries worldwide.

  2. The banner is great, 100% agree but I wouldn’t just say ‘No’ to ‘fracking’ …. Let’s say ‘No’ to EXTRACTION of fossil fuels by ANY METHOD. The oil & gas industry so often gets away with it by saying “we’re not fracking”, when what they are doing is using “well stimulation” techniques such as acidisation. We need to leave them no corners to hide in. NO DRILLING.

    • Ha ha Sal. Please let us know your alternative to no oil, gas, coal and the thousands of every day products made from them?

    • Why? Like i have said before Paul, if you didnt want us to use the stuff, then you really didnt ought to have sold it to us in the first place?

      Or was there a small print clause on the product that said:

      “only for use if you want to cause global climate change disaster, but not for protesting about Big Oil and Gas exclusive monopoly on energy sources”?

      We just see a price at the pump, or on the packaging, we do not see:

      “this product and packaging will kill the planet” or “this oil based product is injurious to your health and everyone and everything on the planet”?

      Perhaps we should see such labelling in future? I am sure Greta will agree.

      I say its magnificently ironic and entirely appropriate to use their own product to protest against them, to travel or any other activity that will stop the fossil fuel madness.

      Well said Sal, you neither need nor asked for the industry’s permission to do anything, and never did.

      • That is the worst argument ever Phil…

        Put down your plastic phone please.

        Nobody is forcing you to put your Gas Central heating on, so leave it off…

        • No, kishy [edited by moderator], it is the best argument ever, if you dont want people to use energy freely by their own choice, and without doubtful control freakery provisos.

          It is energy that they have paid for themselves, when its the only one provided, then the fossil fuel industry didn’t ought to have sold it to them in the first place should they?

          Are you seeking to dictate how people use energy now? Anyone can use it how they please, and without anyone elses say so, simple as that.

          That is what is called glorious irony kishy, and it is justice too, to use their own overpriced polluting energy to protest against them poisoning and destroying their own communities, what could be more amusingly ironic than that?

          • Go ahead and make your banner Sal, ignore these fossil fuel fools who only want to decry anyone who dares to stand up and protest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.