Two scientists have said the rules on fracking-induced earth tremors could be relaxed with little risk to people.
Under the current traffic light system, fracking must stop for 18 hours if the operation induces seismic activity of 0.5ML (local magnitude) or above.
Now Dr Brian Baptie, of the British Geological Survey (BGS), and Dr Ben Edwards, of Liverpool University, argued that the limit could be raised safely to 1.5ML, which, they said, was unlikely to be felt.
Their proposal, made in a media briefing earlier today, was welcomed by Cuadrilla, which triggered 57 earth tremors when it fracked in Lancashire last year.
But opponents of Cuadrilla’s operations said people were less concerned what was felt at the surface and more about what happened at the depth of the wellbore. Campaigners in Lancashire said they would consider a legal challenge if the government gave into industry lobbying for a higher limit.
Cuadrilla’s fracking operations at Preston New Road triggered three tremors which exceeded the 0.5ML red traffic light level during fracking last year. Another four passed the 0.5ML threshold after fracking had finished. Two of the tremors, measuring 1.1ML and 1.5ML were felt by people living and working locally.
The company previously called on the government to raise the 0.5ML threshold. It pointed to higher limits of 4ML in Canada and 2.7 in California.
But the energy minister, Claire Perry, has said there are no plans to relax the rules. In a letter to Cuadrilla in November 2018, she said the current system was “fit for purpose” and there was “no intention of altering it”. She repeated this position in a recent parliamentary answer.
Dr Brian Baptie, head of seismicity at the British Geological Survey, said today:
“The existing regulations are really quite conservative. They are set at a level of earthquake that is really very unlikely to be felt.
“So something like 1.5 is a level of earthquake that is not going to be felt widely by people – I think it is something we ought to have a look at.”
“When earthquakes occur, they cause shaking, so could that shaking damage the wells? I think the risk of that is vanishingly small – it is negligible for such small events”.
Dr Baptie contributed to a government-commissioned report on Cuadrilla’s earlier experience of fracking-induced seismic activity when its first frack at Preese Hall in 2011 prompted earthquakes measuring 2.3ML and1.5ML. That report recommended the current red traffic light of 0.5ML.
The other scientist, Dr Ben Edwards, has contributed to material for Cuadrilla and the government. He said:
“If you want to mitigate any chance of felt activity, similar in vibration magnitude to a building site, we have the correct traffic light system.
“But if you want to go to a risk-based approach, where you allow events that do not pose any risk to humans or structures, then there is scope to review the current system, that could be raised to 1.5 and that would still arguably be conservative.”
Dr Edwards was responsible for recent government-commissioned research which likened the effects at the surface of a 1.1ML tremor to a 1kg bag of flour falling to the floor, and a 1.5ML tremor to a dropped honeydew melon.
Frack Free Lancashire said this evening:
“It seems to have taken the industry spin doctors longer than expected to find a couple of academics prepared to make their case for them.
“However, both of these researchers still appear to be inexplicably fixated on whether a tremor can be felt at surface.
“The Traffic Light System (TLS) was devised, in conjunction with Cuadrilla themselves, to protect the public from the potential subsurface impacts of fracking. It is based on an acceptance that the seismic events (which fracking appears to inevitably unleash in the UK) cannot be constrained by turning off a tap, and that they may get progressively more frequent and larger after the warning level is exceeded and work is stopped.
“The government and local Conservative MP, Mark Menzies, have already stated their opposition to increasing the TLS limits. Claire Perry – the energy minister – stated that would be a “foolish politician who would do things that would be considered to be relaxing regulatory standards when we are trying to reassure people about safety.”
“If the government were seen to be caving in to industry lobbying after they have so clearly demonstrated that they are unable to control the seismic activity caused by their operations, we will consider seeking a legal challenge.”
John Sauven, executive of director of Greenpeace UK, said:
“This is a barely disguised attempt to mislead people. The main concern over tremors caused by fracking is not damage caused at the surface but damage caused to the well.
“This is likely to be near the epicentre of the quake. We know this is a risk. It is exactly what happened at the UK’s first fracked well at Preese Hall in 2011. The well bore damage was observed after quakes which caused no damage at the surface.”
A spokesperson for Cuadrilla said:
“We were pleased to hear this. We have collected an extensive data set from our operations at the shale gas exploration site in Preston New Road, Blackpool, including the most comprehensive micro-seismic data set ever collected at a shale site.
“We have shared this with the relevant regulators and experts to enable further understanding of how best to safely and effectively progress this important industry”.