The Swedish climate campaigner, Greta Thunberg, told thousands of people in Glasgow this afternoon that the COP26 conference had turned into a PR event and a global green wash festival.
The 18-year-old was speaking at a rally in George Square attended by more than 10,000 people:
“It is not a secret that CoP26 is a failure. It should be obvious that we cannot solve a crisis with the same methods that got us into it in the first place and more and more people are starting to realise this.
“Many are starting to ask themselves ‘What will it take for the people in power to wake up?’
“But let’s be clear – they are already awake. They know exactly what they are doing. They know exactly what priceless values they are sacrificing to maintain business as usual.”
Greta Thunberg said leaders were not leading but “actively creating loopholes” to benefit themselves and continuing profiting from a destructive system.” She said:
“The COP has turned into a PR event, where leaders are giving beautiful speeches and announce fancy commitments and targets while behind the curtains the governments of the global north countries are still refusing to take any drastic climate action.
“It seems like their main goal is to continue to fight for the status quo. This is now a global greenwash festival. A two week long celebration of business as usual and blah blah blah.
“The most affected people in the most affected areas still remain unheard. And the voices of future generations are drowning in their greenwash and empty words and promises.”
She said the world needed “immediate drastic annual emissions cuts, unlike anything the world had ever seen” to minimise the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions.
At current emissions rates, she said, the best chance to staying below the limit of 1.5C of warming will be gone within the end of this decade.
Wow. This is truly what people power looks like.#FridaysForFuture #UprootTheSystem https://t.co/4UiaoUd7e1— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) November 5, 2021
Today’s rally, which followed a march through the city centre from Kelvingrove Park, called for:
- no new investment in oil, gas and coal
- rapid emissions cuts from the global north to prevent warming above 1.5 degrees
- support for the global south to deal with climate impacts they didn’t cause
The huge crowd also heard from the Ugandan campaigner, Vanessa Nakate. She said her country was witnessing the impacts of the climate crisis first hand:
“I come from Kampala, Uganda, a country that has one of the fastest changing climates in the world.
“People are dying, children are dropping out of school, people’s farms are being destroyed.
“We are in a crisis, we are in a disaster that is happening every day.”
She said people must keep up pressure to hold world leaders accountable for climate change.
“Speed-up proposals” – COP26 president
The COP26 president, Alok Sharma, urged climate negotiators to speed up their work so that proposals would be ready for ministers attending the talks next week.
In a letter today, he said:
“The time to shift the mode of work is fast approaching. Next week represents a more political, high-level phase of the conference, with ministers arriving to help draw proceedings to a successful conclusion.”
The International Energy Agency said today that the net zero pledges and commitments to cut methane, if enforced, would limit global warming to 1.8C.
Its executive director, Fatih Birol, described this as “a big step forward, but much more needed”.
To meet the 1.5C limit at the centre of COP26’s aims, the world must cut carbon emissions by 45% by 2030. National plans submitted so far under the UN process will not be enough.
A study by Stockholm Environment Institute and the Institute for European Environmental Policy found that the carbon footprint of the world’s richest 1% would be 30 times higher than what’s needed to limit global warming to 1.5C.
Call for protection of right to protest
Police Scotland said officers would deal “swiftly and robustly” with any violent disorder and damage to property during the protests over the next few days. Large demonstrations are planned for tomorrow in a global day of action.
The COP26 Coalition of climate action groups has written to the Scottish First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, about what it says is heavy-handed policing outside the conference.
There are reports of officers threatening to arrest protesters for holding a banner, abusing stop and search powers, confiscating identification documents, carrying out intrusive surveillance and using kettling, where crowds are held in confined spaces sometimes for longer periods.
The COP26 Coalition said:
“As the Global Day of Action for Climate Justice on Saturday 6th November fast approaches, and we anticipate large numbers of protesters taking to the streets of Glasgow, we are asking you to ensure that all police forces operating in Scotland for the duration of COP26 commit to, and be held to, a set of truly rights-based principles
“Protecting the right protest, no routine surveillance, no excessive use of force, no targeting of the most vulnerable, no abuse of stop and search.”
Assistant Chief Constable Gary Ritchie, of Police Scotland, said of today’s march and rally:
“This was a really important day in the COP26 schedule and we were pleased to be part of such a memorable event for these young participants and for Glasgow. Our officers enjoyed engaging with young people, many have children of their own who were taking part in today’s march.
“Policing of this event was, as promised, proportionate, as has been our overall approach throughout COP26. Our officers stayed in the background but were there to support young people and be on hand if needed to ensure their safety.”
Tomorrow’s Global Day of Action march in Glasgow could attract 50,000 people.
Mr Ritchie said:
“We will be there to maintain the safety of the public and participants and to protect the rights of people who wish to peacefully protest or to counter-protest. These rights are always balanced against the rights of the wider community.”
Minister urges young people not to miss school
The UK education secretary, Nadhim Zahawi, urged young people not to miss school today. He said he’d rather they marched on Saturday and Sunday. He said it was important that young people engaged with world leaders and were “part of the solution”. But he said this should not be at the expense of missing schools.
Ms Sturgeon, paid tribute to young people who took part in the march rally. They were “powering this agenda”. Ms Sturgeon said:
“What I would say to people protesting today and tomorrow is be peaceful, make your voices heard, respect the citizens of the city but protest is a powerful part of any process of change and it particularly important at this time.”
Glasgow City Council and neighbouring authorities have said they will not censure young people who took part today.
Mr Zahawi also launched a sustainability and climate change strategy to embed climate change evidence in the school curriculum.
“All children will be taught about the importance of conserving and protecting our planet with teachers supported to deliver world-leading climate change education”
Plans were also announced for a climate leaders’ award recognising efforts to protect the environment.
“All children will be taught about the importance of conserving and protecting our planet with teachers supported to deliver world-leading climate change education” (Zahawi). Alternatively “blah, blah, blah!”
Are the terms “world-leading” and UK not synonymous adjectives for this government, in theory if not, manifestly, in practice? Get on with it, but not with this government’s gloss.
The Queen of PR events moans about? PR events!
Gosling and ganders.
Meanwhile, my sympathies are with Surfers against Sewage. Looks as if they made some progress recently, although I fear that to engineer sufficient capacity to deal with storm run off will take quite a few years-during which time far more houses will be built with concrete gardens causing even more storm run off.
Control the cause might be cheaper than trying to play catch up with the result? And, that may not be storms.
This sounds like Greta ramping up her own PR machine again.
We have an immense debt of gratitude owing to Greta and “her ….. PR machine”. The “own” carries an unwelcome suggestion of lack of integrity, probably unintended.
I have learnt such a lot from this COP. We are at 5 minutes to midnight (but some of us like nightclubs so that’s ok then). On the way to Rome for a pre-COP jaunt, Johnson said to fellow plane passengers that we are at half time in a game of football (does he think that the other half will only take 5 minutes?) Our side, Humanity is 5 to 1 down but at the COP he said we had progressed to putting in one. maybe two goals and he is confident that we would be able to take this to extra time
Then he clocks off early to take his private jet back to London to dine with a climate change denier
And we wonder why the rest of the world laugh at us or hang their heads in despair
But that’s alright – bash the young
Not a case of bashing the young, msl, and 18 is not that young.
I was once. But, I have grown up. I have children who tell me how much better they could do things. That’s fine, we all did that. Some do better, many don’t.
So, if Boris goes to the G20, yes, some will call it a jaunt. Maybe he would rather have stayed at home, but that is part of his job, especially when it is followed by COP..
I wonder how the others (rest of the world) travelled to the G20, or to COP? Maybe Boris will get his plans for carbon zero flight rolled out. Until then, like you, he will have to use fossil fuel to try to influence. But, he can’t be totally successful otherwise there would be nothing left for the young to do.
“I’ve pointed out before and more than once, that it is not hypocrisy to use the means available when, in effect, no other means are available. To answer “Yes it is!”, is hardly a convincing response.” (Myself)
Martin Frederick Collyer
October 29, 2021 at 4:43 pm
“Yes it is.”
Followed by (above):
“ I wonder how the others (rest of the world) travelled to the G20, or to COP? Maybe Boris will get his plans for carbon zero flight rolled out. Until then, like you, he will have to use fossil fuel to try to influence. “
Well, 1720, perhaps you should direct your comment to MSL, who seemed to have an issue with ‘planes! (1.43pm)
Mind you, I suspect the rest of the world is laughing at “influencers” who so easily get confused.
Especially those who don’t want nice clean high speed rail to provide the alternative, and then use the “no other means available” excuse.
And, if you are so keen to look at previous posts, then yours of 11/3/21 (6.47pm) is another confusion classic.
Consistent, but not coherent.
Martin Frederick Collyer
November 2, 2021 at 8:02 am
“And the last post was made at 11.15pm using artificial light and plastic to do so, quoting planetary interest and the common good, and suggesting that “we” must hope!
OMG, with so many influencers to chose from, that message just about fails every test of scrutiny.”
ABOVE posted as follows:
Martin Frederick Collyer
November 7, 2021 at 6:24 pm, probably from Australia in brilliant sunshine using a green-bean keyboard.
Think it is light at 8.02am, 1720.
As far as 6.24pm is concerned, you confuse me with someone who is an anti. Let me explain it to you-I am not. Sorry that you were confused on that. Maybe the “we” masked that. I don’t use it to avoid that issue.
A little (lol) point of difference that you fail to grasp. But that is not unusual, is it?
So, just more confusion-at 9.15pm from someone who is against the use of fossil fuels.
Sorry, I am not influenced by such confusion. Own up, 1720. You missed the point MSL was making that I responded to, and jumped in with a confused post and now have just tried to cover up with more of the same. It really is stuff from the playground. What next? A buddy to state support?
Meanwhile, back to the substance. I have watched little bits of COP and noted the large numbers of groups from all parts of the globe. That is part of COP to bring their voices to the debate. Do I expect the leaders who will be asked to make the decisions, to travel in a different way? Nope. Is it a new point of fake dissent? Nope-remember G7? Obviously some need to create a reason for dissent, but that is par for the course. I don’t. There is Zoom etc., but I know from experience that agreement is not optimised remotely. COP will not work without agreement and action.
Mind you, if it works, there will be no need for protest. Turkeys and Christmas come to mind.