Regulation

Breaking: Egdon’s bid for more time at Wressle oil site refused unanimously – live news updates

1807 Wressle section planThis post has live updates from the meeting of North Lincolnshire Council’s planning committee which is discussing an application for Egdon’s Wressle oil site.

The company is seeking another year before it has to restore the site near Scunthorpe. This would allow the time for a decision on its other application for long-term oil production at Wressle.

Egdon has said site restoration, which should have been completed by April 2018, is not commercially-viable while the production application is pending.

Planning officers have recommended approval of the extra year. But opponents of the application say this goes against the ruling of a planning inspector earlier this year on when the site should be restored. It is also a breach of planning policy, they say. Background report here from DrillOrDrop 

This is the third meeting in under two years that plans for Wressle have come before the council’s planning committee. Previous applications were refused. Catch up here on DrillOrDrop reports from January 2017 and July 2017, plus the November 2017 public inquiry on the site.

Reporting at this planning meeting was made possible by individual donations to DrillOrDrop


180801-nlc-wressle-1.jpg

North Lincolnshire Council planning committee, 1 August 2018. Photo: DrillOrDrop

3.37pm: Vote – refusal

The application is refused unanimously. DrillOrDrop report on reaction

mick-grant-nlc3.35pm: Cllr Mick Grant

Cllr Grant says he will vote against because he wants Egdon to get the [production] application moving so that people know what is going to happen.

“I implore Egdon to get the application here as soon as possible”, he says. The planning officer says the application is in the system.

3.34pm: Cllr Sandra Bainbridgesandra-bainbridge-nlc

Cllr Bainbridge says the key factor is: has the company complied with local and national planning policy and the inspector’s recommendation. No it has not she says.

“If the company wanted to improve its position in north Lincolnshire it would have complied but it has not.

“I will not be supporting the application.”

John Collinson3.32pm: Cllr John Collinson

Cllr Collinson says the risk of extra expense to the company does not outweigh the risk to the area.

ivan-glover-nlc3.31pm: Cllr Ivan Glover

Cllr Glover represents with the local area and is also a member of the committee.

He says the extension of planning permission would not concur with local and national planning policy.

He proposes the application be refused.

len-foster3.28pm: Cllr Len Foster

Cllr Foster says he is a former member of the planning committee, who opposed previous applications, He says he expressed his concern then about the lack of faith in the Environment Agency to protect local residents on this and other issues.

The company, their history on this site, is questionable, he says. Its intent to enhance the lives of North Lincolnshire is negligible,  he says.

“They have treated the residents with disdain. They have not helped the people in any way.”

There is nothing new being offered by Egdon, Cllr Foster says .

“There is nothing that improves the lives of people of north Lincolnshire. All it does is to help a company make more money to extract fossil fuels. Fossil fuel extraction is not sustainable.”

“My position has not changed. I think it is the wrong application. It is the wrong place. The company’s motives are questionable.”

holly-mumby-croft-nlc3.24pm: Cllr Holly Mumby-Croft, local “”councillor

Cllr Mumby-Croft supports the residents.

She says she sat through the public inquiry. She says:

“It is really quite simple.

“The inquiry required the structures removed and the site restored no later than the 28 April 2018, which is three months ago.

“I don’t know why Egdon waited until 13 April 2018 to put in an application for an extension. It is disrespectful to the residents when it always intended to put in a new application for production.”

Egdon understood the inquiry inspector’s condition, she says. It is simple.

She points to the committee to a paragraph 144 of the NPPF that requires restoration as soon as possible.

I can see no planning reason to approve the application, she says.

“It is not acceptable to come to the committee and behave like this.”

Paul-Foster-175x2333.16pm: Speaker in favour – Paul Foster

Mr Foster, speaking for Egdon Resources, says planning officers recommended the application should be approved.

He says the application to extend time for the site was submitted before the previous permission expired.

The site has had significant investment, he says. The extension will avoid unnecessary work, he says.

He acknowledges that the extension would not comply with the National Planning Policy Framework and local planning policy. The extension is modest, he adds. There are no operations that would be undertaken, apart from ongoing monitoring and security. It would be only care and maintenance until the application for production is decided.

He rejects suggestions that the site is a blot on the landscape. It is 500m from the nearest home and 800m from the nearest public footpath. It is not a designated area off outstanding natural beauty or landscape importance. The extension will not have an impact on the landscape, he says.

Broughton Town Council had objected because the inquiry extended the site’s life only until April 2018, Mr Foster. He says the new production application could not be submitted in that time because it needed to prepare new documents.

The new NPPF, issued since the committee report, includes new advice for planning authorities on onshore oil and gas. They should facilitate oil extraction and exploration.

The NPPF requires restoration as soon as possible. But there are other considerations, Mr Foster says. There are no adverse impacts on the surroundings or living conditions on local residents, Mr Foster says. The extension would avoid abortive work. Egdon, as an responsible operator, wants to regularise the planning permission, he says.

171108 Wressle PI DoD 13.13pm: Speaker against – Martin Foster

Mr Foster, the British Steel works convenor in Scunthorpe, says he is speaking with the support of local convenors for Unite and the GMB unions.

He says he has seen no evidence that the proposal will protect the British Steel boreholes. If these were contaminated the site would be shut down.

This is another example of a corporate entity that refuses to take no for an answer”

The planning inspector’s instruction was very clear. The company should restore the site by the end of April. This has not started. They have no intention of doing this. This application is a delaying tactic, he says.

It shows disrespect for the committee and the council and he urges the committee to reject the proposal

3.09pm: Speaker against – Melanie Dale

Ms Dale, who lives locally and was brought up at Wressle.

She tells the committee Egdon said it did not plan to frack. But she says she was angry to hear that the company planned to acid frack.

She says there have been a catalogue of errors in the applications. The latest was the objection date advertised in Broughton, which was incorrect, she says.

If we allow the extension we are paving the way to the new application. It starts with one well, she says. This will not be enough. There will be wells across north Lincolnshire.

The Axholme Way will go past the site. This operation is not in keeping with our area anymore. This company is not very competent, she says. The planning inspector identified how the liner and stone were not adequate or appropriate.

“I have no faith in this company to do this safely. Please think about the legacy we are leaving to our grand children.”

3.04pm: Speaker against – Andrew McLeod

Mr McLeod tells the committee:

“I thank your planning officer for drawing your attention to NPPF paragraph 93 and policy CS18, both of which ask you to consider the climate change impacts of your decisions, but I respectfully take issue with his assertion that my objection on climate change grounds concerns only the application for hydrocarbon production.  It does not, it clearly refers to this application.”

He says “Climate change isn’t just about people hurting polar bears and coral reefs; it’s about people hurting people.”

“Africa’s hottest ever recorded temperature, 51.3 degrees, was registered in Algeria on 5 July.

“A few days earlier Oman broke the world record for the highest overnight minimum temperature ever recorded – 42.6 degrees.

And all this is with the global warming of “only” 1 degree that our uncontrolled burning of fossil fuels has already caused.”

Scientists keep on telling us we should constrain this increasing likelihood  of extreme weather events by restricting greenhouse gas emissions as sharply as possible.

“The remaining carbon budget for achieving the 1.5 degree target set by the Paris Climate Agreement will be used up just by burning what’s in the currently operating oil and gas wells alone, even if we stop burning coal altogether.

“We are currently on track to exceed 3 degrees of warming, which will be catastrophic.  Against this background, Egdon must not be allowed to retain their Wressle-1 wellsite with the intention of using it to extract even more climate-wrecking oil and gas.”

Mr McLeod says: “Divestment is one powerful way to hasten the transition to clean energy; refusing permission for new oil and gas extraction is another.  I applaud your steadfast opposition to this damaging and unnecessary development and I urge you once again to stand firm: please refuse this application and immediately enforce compliance with the site restoration conditions.”

3.01pm: Speaker against – Jean Turner

Mrs Turner tells the committee it should oppose the application.

She says she visited the site during the previous inquiry. She said the site bund and membrane had been “shredded” by rabbits.

Egdon has contempt for the council, Mrs Turner says. Responsibility stops with the council, she says.

2.56pm: Speaker against – Elizabeth Williams

Ms Williams said the application would open the site to acid fracking.

She said:

“The people of North Lincolnshire – through their elected representatives (January 2017) voted NO and that the site must be fully restored and exited by the end of April 2017. This was breached while a revised plan was submitted.

The people of North Lincolnshire – through their elected representatives – voted NO again (in July last year) Which this time went to Appeal. And the Planning Inspector ruled NO to long-term production, she says.

Ms Williams says this is now in breach and yet another, third, revised long-term production is looming over us.

So, we are stuck in a permanent scenario of permission creep with each breach being overlapped by another revised planning application. The latest of which included the wrong site map for an entirely different geographical location.

Ms Williams quoted one of the nearest residents to the site, Jim Mallam. He says:

“In addition to my objections earlier this year against the proposal by Egdon Resources to extract oil and gas from Wressle well by the unproven and untried proppant squeeze system, I find it extremely hard to understand that a supposedly professional transparent company who operate within the law, have taken upon itself to show complete and utter contempt and disregard to the authority of North Lincs Council, North Lincs Planning Committee and indeed the residents of North Lincolnshire in general.

“Egdon Resources were lawfully instructed to remove all equipment from the Wressle site by 28th April 2018 and return it agricultural conditions but chose not to comply.

“The fact that Egdon Resources deliberately refused to comply with this lawful instruction, demonstrates the management of this company have no respect for, or indeed have no intention of accepting the authority, instructions or guide lines from North Lincs Council or indeed of any other authority as they feel they have the right to do as they see fit.

“North Lincs Council and Planning are fully aware that this is the first step towards the exploitation of North Lincolnshire by Egdon Resources and the only thing Egdon will bring to the table is pollution and destruction of our environment.

“If this application was to be approved, everyone knows this will be just the foot in the door and North Lincs will be bombarded with applications for additional drill sites for this form of fracking for conventional oil reserves.”

Ms Williamson urges the committee:

“Please can you observe your duty of care to the people of North Lincolnshire – [and indeed the entire planet] – become local and national heroes again Refuse the plan outright and insist that Applicant fully restores the site and leave us all to get on with our lives?”

2.55pm: Start of consideration of Egdon application

Chairman Nigel Sherwood introduces the Egdon Resources application for Lodge Farm at Wressle.

2.45pm: Major applications

2.52pm: Change of condition for biomass facility – granted

2.41pm: Grazing in East Lound – granted

2.45pm: Housing in Keadby with Althorpe – granted

2.05pm: Small applications

2.32pm: Housing plan in Rebourne – granted

2.24pm: Change of use of home to care home in Scunthorpe – refused

2.22pm: Housing plans in Haxey – granted

2.06pm: Housing plans in Ealand – refused

2pm: Meeting opens

Committee chair, Nigel Sherwood, opens the meeting.

Reporting at this planning meeting was made possible by individual donations to DrillOrDrop

44 replies »

  1. Paul Foster, Egdon Resources, says that retaining the site will have “no environmental impact”. “The 12 month retention is a modest period of time,” he said. “There are no operations proposed to be undertaken.” – CR

    • Basically Egdon thought they could do as they please, ignore the residents and have a total disregard for the NPPF.

      How incredibly naive and wrong they were.

      I look forward to them making another blunder and going to appeal and telling the inspector they are above the NPPF

      Great posts on Councillors driving home in their cars.

      Really clarifies a good understanding of the NPPF

    • Yes they will and they will sleep with clear consciences unlike the greedy investors who have lost nearly 15% today , good job done .

  2. Refused – so Egdon appeal again – or they restore the site, apply for PP for a replica of the site, re-drill the well……. That looks like a lot of extra traffic and greenhouse gas for a stupid decision. Well done Councillors…

  3. I have to say I’m not surprised. N. Lincs Council has proven to be the worst one yet and the councilors are way out of their depth. The planning inspector refused it eventually on grounds that weren’t even brought up at the hearing stages. Shows why the country is literally going down the toilet.

  4. “2.56pm: Speaker against – Elizabeth Wressle

    Ms Williams said the application would open the site to acid fracking.”

    Oh dear – typo?

    Reading it again it would appear that Egdon’s plan is to appeal while the application for production process is underway, in a perfect Egdon world the Appeal will be won at the same time as the application for production is approved. They probably don’t need to win the appeal, just buy the time. They have 6 months to lodge an appeal?

  5. I see Councillor Grant has his finger on the pulse….not. How can you give grown-up decisions to these people? The sooner the government decide this, the better.

    Cllr Grant says he will vote against because he wants Egdon to get the [production] application moving so that people know what is going to happen. I implore Egdon to get the application here as soon as possible. The planning officer says the application is in the system.

    • Councillors and MPs are elected to represent their wards and constituencies, that is democracy. The government ignoring local democracy, ignoring communities is not democracy. Be careful what you wish for because following this path could lead to lots of decisions being made by the state and you’re not far removed from a fascist state. Industrial development on agricultural, green belt and rural land has the potential to allow other firms of development to take place in areas where it would not usually be permitted. These councillors have every right to take decisions. And if you look at the previous Wressle appeal the councillors were found to have been right to oppose the application. This was despite the council officers and the EA recommending approval. Indeed in his formal decision the Inspector was highly critical of the EA and completely upheld the councillors refusal.

      • I think you must have replied on the wrong thread, KatT. Your reply had nothing whatsoever to do with the point I was making.

    • Yep , the councillors are middle aged adolescents throwing a hissy fit and to be incapable of behaving like adults .

      Cllr Len Foster is enacting his own little ideological war against fossil fuel extraction .

      He not only objects to fossil fuel exploration and production but also to the profit imperative which enables companies to create jobs and retain workers .

      It makes one wonder where his own money comes from and whether he puts any of it where his mouth is by risking it in renewable energy ventures .

  6. I find it incredible that Mr McLeod seems to think that we should pay money to some of the most corrupt countries in the world, with the worst human rights records and apparent disdain for the environment, so that we can import their oil rather than produce our own, where we have the safest production regimes in the world. And who is worse off as a result? The United Kingdom is.

    • Yet we have no problem selling billions of pounds worth of weapons to many of these regimes so that argument does not hold up to scrutiny. And I gather that at best UK unconventional gas will only supply around 50% of UK consumption so we are unlikely to be self sufficient and imports would continue. Unless of course the government changes policy and massively invests in renewables of course. And then of course there is the elephant in the room aka climate change. And currently the CCC’s advice is that there is “no room for fracking”.

    • I find it incredible that some anti anti’s don’t want to import gas from Norway but are happy to see the Chinese flood the UK with consumables.

  7. This is insignificant.

    The application for production will meet the Inspector’s requirements, and even if the Council turn it down, it will be referred back to the Inspector.

  8. Oh look at all the rage here , suck it up guys , its going to be the norm now for these PONZI schemes , you were warned .

    • You clearly have no idea what a PONZI scheme is, Jono. You just make yourself look silly using comparisons like that.

  9. I think he is confused with Tesla, Terri.

    I see little sign of rage. This is insignificant, and will not materially change the application. That is the norm.

    • No, you are wrong both of you, it is ecological overshoot day today, we have used one earths worth of natures ability to recoup its resources, we are now heading towards 1.7 times the planets ability to recover.

      It is now, and has been for many years, an ecological ponzi scheme, see Jono’s link on next topic page.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.